The OKb Laws (Draft 1) Marked Revision against
the Laws of Duplicate Contract Bridge - 1997 (European Edition)









THE OKBRIDGE LAWS



For use in non-tourney play on OKbridge, where players do not have access to a director, these are an adapted and annotated version of the:

Laws of Duplicate Contract Bridge – 1997
European Edition
as promulgated by
The World Bridge Federation
and approved by the
European Bridge League
Effective October 1997
Published and distributed by the European Bridge League




Promulgating Body and Approving Bodies



Promulgating Body

The World Bridge Federation

Drafting Committee

Edgar Kaplan Chairman
Karen AllisonGrattan Endicott
Ralph CohenChip Martel
Roger Stern

Approving Bodies

European Bridge League
The Portland Club
The American Contract Bridge League


The Laws Committee of the European Bridge League

Ton Kooijman Chairman
Bill PencharzJens Auken
Max BavinClaude Dadoun
Grattan EndicottAntonio Riccardi

The Portland Club Card Committee
D T H DavenportChairman
C G R LeachD P Marchessini
J S Wheeler
J G Faulkner(English Bridge Union)
R S Brock (N. Ireland Bridge Union)
J M MacLaren(Scottish Bridge Union)
P D Jourdain (Welsh Bridge Union)

The Laws Commission of the American Contract Bridge League
Edgar KaplanCo-Chairman
Ralph CohenCo-Chairman
Karen R. AllisonRalph Cohen
Henry A. LortzEdgar Kaplan
Amalya KearseSami R. Kehela
Jeffrey D. PolisnerChip Martel
Eric RodwellGeorge Rosenkranz
Roger D. SternPeggy B. Sutherlin
Brian MoranKatie Thorpe
Bobby WolffRoy G. Green
Alan LeBendigChris Patrias
David McGee



The International Code
Laws of Duplicate Contract Bridge – 1997
Preface to the European Edition


The Laws of Duplicate Contract Bridge, 1997 ("the 1997 Code") was approved by the World Bridge Federation and the European Bridge League in Montecatini Terme, Italy in June 1997 and formally promulgated by the World Bridge Federation in Hammamet, Tunisia in October 1997, immediately prior to the 1997 Bermuda Bowl and Venice Cup.
The 1997 Code supersedes the, previous, 1987 Laws of Duplicate Contract Bridge. Each National Contract Bridge Organisation (NCBO) which is a member of the European Bridge League has discretion as to the effective date when the 1997 Code is introduced, but in any event it must not be later than the end of the 1997/98 Bridge Playing Season of that NCBO.
The Copyright of the 1997 Code in all non-English speaking countries in Europe (other than Spain and Portugal) is vested in the European Bridge League.
The Copyright in the area of the British Commonwealth past and present (other than the Western Hemisphere), the Continent of Africa, Spain, Portugal and all English speaking countries in the Eastern Hemisphere is vested in the Portland Club.
The Copyright in the Western Hemisphere and in the Republic of the Philippines is vested in the American Contract Bridge League.
Extracts from these Laws either verbatim or paraphrased are not permitted without the sanction of the Authority holding the Copyright.
Within those areas where the Copyright is vested in the European Bridge League, the League sanctions, without charge, the translation and verbatim reproduction of the 1997 Code both in written and electronic forms, provided the European Bridge League’s Copyright is acknowledged.

European Bridge League
Montreux, Switzerland
October 1997

Table Of Contents

PROMULGATING BODY AND APPROVING BODIES ...................................................................... .....2
THE INTERNATIONAL CODE ........................................................................................................ .....3
TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................4
CHAPTER I.........................................................................................................................................8
Definitions.....8
CHAPTER II......................................................................................................................................10
Preliminaries...10
LAW 1 - THE PACK — RANK OF CARDS AND SUITS...10
LAW 2 – THE DUPLICATE BOARDS...10
LAW 3 - ARRANGEMENT OF TABLES...10
LAW 4 - PARTNERSHIPS...10
LAW 5 - ASSIGNMENT OF SEATS...10
CHAPTER III.....................................................................................................................................12
Preparation and Progression...12
LAW 6 - THE SHUFFLE AND DEAL...12
LAW 7 - CONTROL OF BOARD AND CARDS...13
LAW 8 - SEQUENCE OF ROUNDS...13
CHAPTER IV.....................................................................................................................................15
General Laws Governing Irregularities...15
LAW 9 - PROCEDURE FOLLOWING AN IRREGULARITY...15
LAW 10 - ASSESSMENT OF A PENALTY...16
LAW 11 - FORFEITURE OF THE RIGHT TO PENALISE...16
LAW 12 - DIRECTOR’S DISCRETIONARY POWERS...16
LAW 13 - INCORRECT NUMBER OF CARDS...17
LAW 14 - MISSING CARD...18
LAW 15 - PLAY OF A WRONG BOARD...19
LAW 16 - UNAUTHORISED INFORMATION...20
CHAPTER V.......................................................................................................................................22
The Auction...22
PART I CORRECT PROCEDURE...22
SECTION ONE AUCTION PERIOD...22
LAW 17 - DURATION OF THE AUCTION...22
LAW 18 - BIDS...22
LAW 19 - DOUBLES AND REDOUBLES...23
LAW 20 - REVIEW AND EXPLANATION OF CALLS...24
LAW 21 - CALL BASED ON MISINFORMATION...25
SECTION TWO AUCTION HAS ENDED...25
LAW 22 - PROCEDURE AFTER THE AUCTION HAS ENDED...25
PART II IRREGULARITIES IN PROCEDURE...27
LAW 23 - DAMAGING ENFORCED PASS...27
SECTION ONE EXPOSED CARD, AUCTION PERIOD...27
LAW 24 - CARD EXPOSED OR LED DURING AUCTION...27
SECTION TWO CHANGES OF CALLS...27
LAW 25 - LEGAL AND ILLEGAL CHANGES OF CALL...27
LAW 26 - CALL WITHDRAWN, LEAD PENALTIES...28
SECTION THREE INSUFFICIENT BID...29
LAW 27 - INSUFFICIENT BID...29
LAW 27 - INSUFFICIENT BID...29
SECTION FOUR CALL OUT OF ROTATION...30
LAW 28 - CALLS CONSIDERED TO BE IN ROTATION...30
LAW 29 - PROCEDURE AFTER A CALL OUT OF ROTATION...30
LAW 30 - PASS OUT OF ROTATION...30
LAW 31 - BID OUT OF ROTATION...31
LAW 32 - DOUBLE OR REDOUBLE OUT OF ROTATION...32
LAW 33 - SIMULTANEOUS CALLS...33
LAW 34 - RETENTION OF RIGHT TO CALL...33
LAW 35 - INADMISSIBLE CALL CONDONED...33
SECTION FIVE INADMISSIBLE CALLS...33
LAW 36 - INADMISSIBLE DOUBLE OR REDOUBLE...33
LAW 37 - ACTION VIOLATING OBLIGATION TO PASS...34
LAW 38 - BID OF MORE THAN SEVEN...34
LAW 39 - CALL AFTER FINAL PASS...34
SECTION SIX CONVENTIONS AND AGREEMENTS...34
LAW 40 - PARTNERSHIP UNDERSTANDINGS...34
CHAPTER VI.....................................................................................................................................36
The Play...36
PART I PROCEDURE...36
SECTION ONE CORRECT PROCEDURE...36
LAW 41 - COMMENCEMENT OF PLAY...36
LAW 42 - DUMMY’S RIGHTS...36
LAW 43 - DUMMY’S LIMITATIONS...37
LAW 44 - SEQUENCE AND PROCEDURE OF PLAY...38
LAW 45 - CARD PLAYED...39
SECTION TWO IRREGULARITIES IN PROCEDURE...40
LAW 46 - INCOMPLETE OR ERRONEOUS CALL OF CARD FROM DUMMY...40
LAW 47 - RETRACTION OF CARD PLAYED...41
PART II PENALTY CARD...43
LAW 48 - EXPOSURE OF DECLARER’S CARDS...43
LAW 49 - EXPOSURE OF A DEFENDER’S CARDS...43
LAW 50 - DISPOSITION OF PENALTY CARD...43
LAW 51 - TWO OR MORE PENALTY CARDS...44
LAW 52 - FAILURE TO LEAD OR PLAY A PENALTY CARD...45
PART III IRREGULAR LEADS AND PLAYS...46
SECTION ONE LEAD OUT OF TURN...46
LAW 53 - LEAD OUT OF TURN ACCEPTED...46
;LAW 54 - FACED OPENING LEAD OUT OF TURN...46
LAW 55 - DECLARER’S LEAD OUT OF TURN...47
LAW 56 - DEFENDER’S LEAD OUT OF TURN...47
SECTION TWO OTHER IRREGULAR LEADS AND PLAYS...47
LAW 57 - PREMATURE LEAD OR PLAY BY DEFENDER...47
LAW 58 - SIMULTANEOUS LEADS OR PLAYS...48
LAW 59 - INABILITY TO LEAD OR PLAY AS REQUIRED...49
LAW 60 - PLAY AFTER AN ILLEGAL PLAY...49
SECTION THREE THE REVOKE...49
LAW 61 - FAILURE TO FOLLOW SUIT - INQUIRIES CONCERNING A REVOKE...49
LAW 62 - CORRECTION OF A REVOKE...50
LAW 63 - ESTABLISHMENT OF A REVOKE...51
LAW 64 - PROCEDURE AFTER ESTABLISHMENT OF A REVOKE...51
PART IV TRICKS...52
LAW 65 - ARRANGEMENT OF TRICKS...52
LAW 66 - INSPECTION OF TRICKS...53
LAW 67 - DEFECTIVE TRICK...53
PART V CLAIMS AND CONCESSIONS...54
LAW 68 - CLAIM OR CONCESSION OF TRICKS...55
LAW 69 - ACQUIESCENCE IN CLAIM OR CONCESSION...55
LAW 70 - CONTESTED CLAIMS...56
LAW 71 - CONCESSION CANCELLED...57
CHAPTER VII....................................................................................................................................58
Proprieties...58
LAW 72 - GENERAL PRINCIPLES...58
LAW 73 - COMMUNICATION...59
LAW 74 - CONDUCT AND ETIQUETTE...60
LAW 75 - PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS...62
LAW 76 - SPECTATORS...63
CHAPTER VIII...................................................................................................................................64
The Score...64
LAW 77 - DUPLICATE BRIDGE SCORING TABLE...64
LAW 78 - METHODS OF SCORING...64
LAW 79 - TRICKS WON...65
CHAPTER IX.....................................................................................................................................66
Tournament Sponsorship...66
LAW 80 - SPONSORING ORGANISATION...66
CHAPTER X......................................................................................................................................67
Tournament Director...67
SECTION ONE RESPONSIBILITIES...67
LAW 81 - DUTIES AND POWERS...67
LAW 82 - RECTIFICATION OF ERRORS OF PROCEDURE...68
LAW 83 - NOTIFICATION OF THE RIGHT TO APPEAL...68
SECTION TWO RULINGS...69
LAW 84 - RULINGS ON AGREED FACTS...69
LAW 85 - RULINGS ON DISPUTED FACTS...69
SECTION THREE CORRECTION OF IRREGULARITIES...69
LAW 86 - IN TEAM PLAY...70
LAW 87 - FOULED BOARD...70
SECTION FOUR PENALTIES...70
LAW 88 - AWARD OF INDEMNITY POINTS...70
LAW 89 - PENALTIES IN INDIVIDUAL EVENTS...70
LAW 90 - PROCEDURAL PENALTIES...71
LAW 91 - PENALISE OR SUSPEND...71
CHAPTER XI.....................................................................................................................................72
APPEALS...72
LAW 92 - RIGHT TO APPEAL...72
LAW 93 - PROCEDURES OF APPEAL...72
INDEX..................................................................................................................................................72



LAWS OF DUPLICATE CONTRACT BRIDGE – 1997

INTERPRETATION OF THE LAWS




The first Laws of Duplicate Contract Bridge were published in 1928. There have been successive revisions in 1933, 1935, 1943, 1949, 1975 and 1987.


NOTES TO READER

The numbering scheme of the 1997 Laws is being retained, to permit ready reference and avoid confusion. Accordingly, there are many gaps in the numbering of provisions.I’m attempting to maintain the index system provided with the 1997 Laws. Errors are resulting from my unfamiliarity with WORD97 indexing facilities.

My general approach has been to delete provisions which have no relevance to OKb play, such as revokes, bids and plays out of rotation, insufficient bids, defective deals, and so forth. All references to a Director have been removed. Generally, where the Laws provide for an adjusted score in the Director’s discretion, the OKb Laws provide for the skip of the board at the election of the non-offending side, with the election to be made at the earliest possible moment to avoid the "double shot" issues. A different approach is taken for claims, which reflects OKb practice. Undo’s and the distinction between public and private chat are given formal recognition. Additional proprieties are proposed.

This Draft (draft 3) of the OKb Laws was revision marked against the 1997 Laws. Provisions not complete in Draft 2 have been added and a number of minor corrections have been made. If the reader prefers to remove revision markings, this may be done (in WORD97) by selecting Tools/Track Changes/Select or Reject Changes/Accept all Changes.

R. Wigdor, October 9, 1997


Prior to the 1987 Laws words such as may, should, shall and must were used without much discrimination. In 1987 they were rationalised, and the practice is continued in the current Laws. When these Laws say that a player "may" do something ("any player may call attention to an irregularity during the auction"), the failure to do it is not wrong. A simple declaration that a player "does" something ("....dummy spreads his hand in front of him...") establishes correct procedure without any suggestion that a violation be penalised. When a player "should" do something ("a claim should be accompanied at once by a statement..."),his failure to do it is an infraction of Law, which will jeopardise his rights, but which will seldom incur a procedural penalty. In contrast, when these Laws say that a player "shall" do something ("No player shall take any action until the Director has explained....), a violation will be penalised more often than not. The strongest word, "must" ("before making a call, he must inspect the face of his cards"), indicates that violation is regarded as serious. Note that "may" becomes very strong in the negative: "may not" is a stronger injunction than "shall not", just short of "must not."

A great deal of effort has been expended to make these Laws easy to use. References from one Law to another have been made more explicit. The hundreds of headings and sub-headings can help a Director find the section of a Law that is applicable to the facts of a case (these headings are for convenience of reference only; headings are not considered to be part of the Laws).




CHAPTER I
Definitions

Adjusted Score
An arbitrary score awarded by the Director (see Law 12 ). It is either ``artificial'' or ``assigned''.
1. An artificial adjusted score is one awarded in lieu of a result because no result can be obtained or estimated for a particular deal (e.g., when an irregularity prevents play of a deal).
2. An assigned adjusted score is awarded to one side, or to both sides, to be the result of the deal in place of the result actually obtained after an irregularity.

Alert
A notification, whose form may be specified by a sponsoring organisation, notification in one of the forms made available by the OKb Software, to the effect that opponents may be in need of an explanation.

Auction
1. The process of determining the contract by means of successive calls.
2. The aggregate of calls made (see Law 17E).

Bid
An undertaking to win at least a specified number of odd tricks in a specified denomination.

Board
1. A duplicate board as described in Law 2 .
2. The four hands as originally dealt and placed in a duplicate board for play during that session.for competitive non-tourney play by the OKb Server.

Call
Any bid, double, redouble or pass.

Contestant
In an individual event, a player; in a pair event, two players playing as partners throughout the event; in a team event, four or more players playing as teammates.

Contract
The undertaking by declarer's side to win, at the denomination named, the number of odd tricks specified in the final bid, whether undoubled, doubled, or redoubled.

Convention 
1. A call that, by partnership agreement, conveys a meaning other than willingness to play in the denomination named (or in the last denomination named), or high-card strength or length (three cards or more) there. However, an agreement as to overall strength does not make a call a convention.
2. Defender's play that serves to convey a meaning by agreement rather than inference.

Deal
1. The distribution of the pack to form the hands of the four players.
2. The cards so distributed considered as a unit, including the auction and play thereof.

Declarer
The player who, for the side that makes the final bid, first bid the denomination named in that bid. He becomes declarer when the opening lead is faced (but see Law 54A when the opening lead is made out of turn).

Defender
An opponent of (presumed) declarer.

Denomination
The suit or notrump specified in a bid.

Director
A person designated to supervise a duplicate bridge contest and to apply these Laws.

Double
A call over an opponent's bid increasing the scoring value of fulfilled or defeated contracts (see Law 19 and Law 77).

Dummy
1. Declarer's partner. He becomes dummy when the opening lead is faced.
2. Declarer's partner's cards, once they are spread on the table after the opening lead.

Event
A contest of one or more sessions.

Follow Suit
Play a card of the suit that has been led.

Game
100 or more trick points scored on one deal.

Hand
The cards originally dealt to a player, or the remaining portion thereof.

Honour
Any Ace, King, Queen, Jack or 10.

International Matchpoint (IMP)
A unit of scoring awarded according to a schedule established in Law 78B .

Irregularity
A deviation from the correct procedures set forth in the Laws.

Lead
The first card played to a trick.

LHO
Left-hand opponent.

Matchpoint
A unit of scoring awarded to a contestant as a result of comparison with one or more other scores.

Mature Claim
A claim made at a point in the play of a board that the unproven distribution or placement of the defenders’ cards can not affect the number of tricks that will be won by declarer.

Misclaim
A claim to win an incorrect number of tricks.

Odd Trick
Each trick to be won by declarer's side in excess of six.

OKb Server
The computing facilities of OKb, to which players using OKb Software are connected over the Internet.

OKb Software
All versions of the OKb client software in current release.

Opening Lead
The card led to the first trick.

Opponent
A player of the other side; a member of the partnership to which one is opposed.

Overtrick
Each trick won by declarer's side in excess of the contract.

Pack
The 52 playing cards with which the game of Contract Bridge is played.

Partner
The player with whom one plays as a side against the other two players.

Partscore
90 or fewer trick points scored on one deal.

Pass
A call specifying that a player does not, at that turn, elect to bid, double or redouble.

Play
1. The contribution of a card from one's hand to a trick, including the first card, which is the lead.
2. The aggregate of plays made.
3. The period during which the cards are played.
4. The aggregate of the calls and plays on a board.

Premature Claim
A claim made at a point in the play of a board that the unproven distribution or placement of the defenders’ cards may affect the number of tricks that will be won by the declarer.

Premium Points
Any points earned other than trick points (see Law 77).

Psychic Call
A deliberate and gross misstatement of honour strength or suit length.

Rectification
Adjustment made to permit the auction or play to proceed as normally as possible after an irregularity has occurred.

Redouble
A call over an opponent's double, increasing the scoring value of fulfilled or defeated contracts (see Law 19 and Law 77).

Revoke
The play of a card of another suit by a player who is able to follow suit or to comply with a lead penalty.

RHO
Right-hand opponent.

Rotation
The clockwise order in which the deal and the right to call or play progresses.

Round
A part of a session played without progressionvariation of players.

Session
An extended period of play during which a number of boards, specified by the sponsoring organisation, is scheduled to be played.The period of play commencing at 00.00h Pacific Time each Sunday and ending at 24.00h Pacific Time each Saturday.

Side
Two players who constitute a partnership against the other two players.

Slam
A contract to win six odd tricks (called Small Slam) or to win seven odd tricks (called Grand Slam).

Suit
One of four groups of cards in the pack, each group comprising thirteen cards and having a characteristic symbol: spades (S), hearts (H), diamonds (D), clubs (C).

Team
Two or more pairs playing in different directions at different tables, but for a common score (applicable regulations may permit teams of more than four members).

Trick
The unit by which the outcome of the contract is determined, regularly consisting of four cards, one contributed by each player in rotation, beginning with the lead.

Trick Points
Points scored by declarer's side for fulfilling the contract (see Law 77).

Trump
Each card of the suit, if any, named in the contract.

Turn
The correct time at which a player may call or play.

Undertrick
Each trick by which declarer's side falls short of fulfilling the contract (see Law 77).

Vulnerability
The conditions for assigning premiums and undertrick penalties (see Law 77).



CHAPTER II
Preliminaries

LAW 1 - THE PACK — RANK OF CARDS AND SUITS

Duplicate Contract Bridge is played with a pack of 52 cards, consisting of 13 cards in each of four suits. The suits rank downward in the order spades (), hearts (), diamonds (), clubs (). The Cards of each suit rank downward in the order Ace, King, Queen, Jack, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2.

LAW 2 – THE DUPLICATE BOARDS


A duplicate board containing a pack is provided for each deal to be played during a session. Each board is numbered and has four pockets to hold the four hands, designated North, East, South and West. The dealer and vulnerability are designated as follows:
North Dealer Boards15913
East DealerBoards261014
South DealerBoards371115
West DealerBoards481216
Neither Side VulnerableBoards181114
North–South VulnerableBoards251215
East–West VulnerableBoards36916
Both Sides VulnerableBoards471013

The same sequence is repeated for Boards 17–32 and for each subsequent group of 16 boards.
No board that fails to conform to these conditions should be used. If such board is used, however, the conditions marked on it apply for that session.

LAW 3 - ARRANGEMENT OF TABLES


Four players play at each table.,and tables are numbered in a sequence established by the Director. He designates one direction as North; other compass directions assume the normal relationship to North.


LAW 4 - PARTNERSHIPS

The four players at each table constitute two partnerships or sides, North–South against East–West. In pair or team events the contestants enter as pairs or teams and retain the same partnerships throughout a session (except in the case of substitutions authorised by the Director). In individual events each player enters separately, and partnerships change during a session.



LAW 5 - ASSIGNMENT OF SEATS


A. Initial Position The Director assigns an initial position to each contestant (individual, pair or team) at the start of a session. Unless otherwise directed, the members of each pair or team may select seats among those assigned to them by mutual agreement. Having once selected a compass direction, a player may change it within a session only upon instruction or with permission of the Director.
B. Change of Direction or Table
Players change their initial compass direction or proceed to another table in accordance with the Director’s instructions. The Director is responsible for clear announcement of instructions; each player is responsible for moving when and as directed and for occupying the correct seat after each change.

CHAPTER III
Preparation and Progression

LAW 6 - THE SHUFFLE AND DEAL


A. The Shuffle Before play starts, each pack is thoroughly shuffled. There is a cut if either opponent so requests.randomized by the OKb Server. B. The Deal The cards must be dealt face down, one card at time, into four hands of thirteen cards each; each hand is then placed face down in one of the four pockets of the board. The recommended procedure is that the cards be dealt in rotation, clockwise.are dealt by the OKb Server. C. Representation of Both Pairs A member of each side should be present during the shuffle and deal unless the Director instructs otherwise. D. New Shuffle and Re-deal 1. Cards Incorrectly Dealt or Exposed

There must be a new shuffle and a re-deal if it is ascertained before the auction begins for both sides (see Law 17A) that the cards have been incorrectly dealt or that a player could have seen the face of a card belonging to another hand.

2. No Shuffle or No Deal

No result may stand if the cards are dealt without shuffle from a sorted deck or if the deal had previously been played in a different session.

3. At Director’s Instruction

Subject to Law 22A, there must be a new shuffle and a redeal when required by the Director for any reason compatible with the Laws (but see Law 86C).

E. Director’s Option on Shuffling and Dealing 1. By Players

The Director may instruct that the shuffle and deal be performed at each table immediately before play starts.

2. By Director

The Director may perform the shuffle and deal in advance, himself.

3. By Agents or Assistants

The Director may have his assistants or other appointed agents perform the shuffle and deal in advance.

4. Different Method of Dealing or Pre-dealing

The Director may require a different method of dealing or pre-dealing.

F. Duplication of Board If required by the conditions of play, one or more exact copies of each original deal may be made under the Director’s instructions.

LAW 7 - CONTROL OF BOARD AND CARDS


A. Placement of Board When a board is to be played it is placed in the centre of the table until play is completed.

B. Removal of Cards from Board Each player takes a hand from the pocket corresponding to his compass position.

1. Counting Cards in Hand before Play

Each player counts his cards face down to be sure he has exactly thirteen; after that, and before making a call, he must inspect the face of his cards.

2. Control of Player’s Hand

During play each player retains possession of his own cards, not permitting them to be mixed with those of any other player. No player shall touch any cards other than his own (but declarer may play dummy’s cards in accordance with Law 45) during or after play except by permission of the Director.

C. Returning Cards to Board Each player shall restore his original thirteen cards to the pocket corresponding to his compass position. Thereafter no hand shall be removed from the board unless a member of each side, or the Director, is present.
D. Responsibility for Procedures Any contestant remaining at a table throughout a session is primarily responsible for maintaining proper conditions of play at the table.
LAW 8 - SEQUENCE OF ROUNDS


A. Movement of Boards and Players 1. Director’s Instructions

The Director instructs the players as to the proper movement of boards and progression of contestants.

2. Responsibility for Moving Boards

The North player at each table is responsible for moving the boards just completed at his table to the proper table for the following round, unless the Director instructs otherwise.
B. End of Round
In general, a round ends when the Director gives the signal for the start of the following round; but if any table has not completed play by that time, the round continues for that table until there has been a progression of players.
C. End of Last Round and End of Session
The last round of a session, and the session itself, ends for each table when play of all boards scheduled at that table has been completed, and when all scores have been entered on the proper scoring forms without objection.

CHAPTER IV
General Laws Governing Irregularities

LAW 9 - PROCEDURE FOLLOWING AN IRREGULARITY


A. Calling Attention to an Irregularity
1. During the Auction Period

Unless prohibited by Law, anyAny player may call attention to an irregularity during the auction, whether or not it is his turn to call.

2. During the Play Period

(a) Unless prohibited by Law, declarer or either defender may call attention to an irregularity that occurs during the play period.

(b) Dummy (dummy’s restricted rights are defined in Laws 42 and 43)

(1) Dummy may not call attention to an irregularity during the play but may do so after play of the hand is concluded.

(2) Dummy may attempt to prevent declarer from committing an irregularity (Law 42B2).

B. After Attention Is Called to an Irregularity


1. Summoning the Director
(a) When to Summon

The Director must be summoned at once when attention is drawn to an irregularity.


When attention is drawn to an irregularity, the contestants should attempt to reach a concensus of the appropriate action to be taken. If no concensus is achieved, the opponents of the player that committed the irregularity may require that the board be skipped, but that requirement must be communicated before any continuation of play.

(b) Who May Summon

Any player, including dummy, may summon the Director after attention has been drawn to an irregularity.

(c) Retention of Rights

Summoning the Director does not cause a player to forfeit any rights to which he might otherwise be entitled.

(d) Opponents’ Rights

The fact that a player draws attention to an irregularity committed by his side does not affect the rights of the opponents.

2. Further Bids or Plays

No player shall take any action until the Director has explained all matters in regard to rectification and to the assessment of a penalty.

C. Premature Correction of an Irregularity


Any premature correction of an irregularity by the offender may subject him to a further penalty (see the lead penalties of Law 26).

LAW 10 - ASSESSMENT OF A PENALTY


A. Right to Assess Penalty
The Director alone has the right to assess penalties when applicable. Players do not have the right to assess (or waive) penalties on their own initiative.

B. Cancellation of Payment or Waiver of Penalty


The Director may allow or cancel any payment or waiver of penalties made by the players without his instructions.

C. Choice after Irregularity


1. Explanation of Options

When these Laws provide an option after an irregularity, the Director shall explain all the options available.

2. Choice among Options

If a player has an option after an irregularity, he must make his selection without consulting partner.


LAW 11 - FORFEITURE OF THE RIGHT TO PENALISE


A. Action by Non-Offending Side
The right to penalise an irregularity may be forfeited if either member of the non-offending side takes any action before summoning the Director. The Director so rules when the non-offending side may have gained through subsequent action taken by an opponent in ignorance of the penalty.


B. Irregularity Called by Spectator

1. Spectator Responsibility of Non-Offending Side

The right to penalise an irregularity may be forfeited if attention is first drawn to the irregularity by a spectator for whose presence at the table the non-offending side is responsible.

2. Spectator Responsibility of Offending Side

The right to correct an irregularity may be forfeited if attention is first drawn to the irregularity by a spectator for whose presence at the table the offending side is responsible.

C. Penalty after Forfeiture of the Right to Penalise

Even after the right to penalise has been forfeited under this Law, the Director may assess a procedural penalty (see Law 90).


LAW 12 - DIRECTOR’S DISCRETIONARY POWERS


A. Right to Award an Adjusted Score
The Director may award an adjusted score (or scores), either on his own initiative or on the application of any player, but only when these Laws empower him to do so, or:

1. Laws Provide No Indemnity

The Director may award an assigned adjusted score when he judges that these Laws do not provide indemnity to the non-offending contestant for the particular type of violation of law committed by an opponent.

2. Normal Play of the Board Is Impossible

The Director may award an artificial adjusted score if no rectification can be made that will permit normal play of the board (see Law 88).

3. Incorrect Penalty Has Been Paid

The Director may award an adjusted score if an incorrect penalty has been paid.


B. No Adjustment for Undue Severity of Penalty
The Director may not award an adjusted score on the ground that the penalty provided in these Laws is either unduly severe or advantageous to either side.


C. Awarding an Adjusted Score

1. Artificial Score

When, owing to an irregularity, no result can be obtained, the Director awards an artificial adjusted score according to responsibility for the irregularity: average minus ( at most 40% of the available matchpoints in pairs) to a contestant directly at fault; average (50% in pairs) to a contestant only partially at fault; average plus (at least 60% in pairs ) to a contestant in no way at fault (see Law 86 for team play or Law 88 for pairs play). The scores awarded to the two sides need not balance.

2. Assigned Score

When the Director awards an assigned adjusted score in place of a result actually obtained after an irregularity, the score is, for a non-offending side, the most favourable result that was likely had the irregularity not occurred or, for an offending side, the most unfavourable result that was at all probable. The scores awarded to the two sides need not balance and may be assigned either in matchpoints or by altering the total-point score prior to matchpointing.

3. Unless Zonal Organizations specify otherwise, an appeals committee may vary an assigned adjusted score in order to do equity.


LAW 13 - INCORRECT NUMBER OF CARDS


When the Director determines that one or more pockets of the board contained an incorrect number of cards, and a player with an incorrect hand has made a call, then when the Director deems that the deal can be corrected and played normally with no change of call, the deal may be so played with the concurrence of all four players. Otherwise, the Director shall award an artificial adjusted score and may penalise an offender. If no such call has been made, then:

A. No Player Has Seen Another’s Card
The Director shall correct the discrepancy as follows and, if no player will then have seen another’s card, shall require that the board be played normally.

1. Hand Records

When hand records are available, the Director shall distribute the cards in accordance with the records.

2. Consult Previous Players

If hand records are not available, the Director shall correct the board by consulting with players who have previously played it.

3. Require a Redeal

If the board was incorrectly dealt, the Director shall require a redeal (Law 6).


B. A Player Has Seen Another Player’s Card(s)
When the Director determines that one or more pockets of the board contained an incorrect number of cards and after restoration of the board to its original condition a player has seen one or more cards of another player’s hand, if the Director deems:

1. The Information Gained Is Inconsequential

that such information will not interfere with normal bidding or play, the Director, with the concurrence of all four players, may allow the board to be played and scored normally.

2. The Information Will Interfere with Normal Play

that the information gained thereby is of sufficient importance to interfere with normal bidding or play, or if any player objects to playing the board, the Director shall award an artificial adjusted score and may penalise an offender.

C. Play Completed


When it is determined after play ends that a player’s hand originally contained more than 13 cards with another player holding correspondingly fewer, the result must be cancelled (for procedural penalty, see Law 90).


LAW 14 - MISSING CARD


A. Hand Found Deficient before Play Commences
When three hands are correct and the fourth is found to be deficient before the play period begins, the Director makes a search for any missing card, and:

1. Card Is Found

If a card is found, it is restored to the deficient hand.

2. Card Cannot Be Found

If a card cannot be found, the Director reconstructs the deal, as near to its original form as he can determine, by substituting another pack.


B. Hand Found Deficient Afterwards

When three hands are correct and the fourth is found to be deficient after the play period begins, the Director makes a search for any missing card, and:

1. Card Is Found

(a) If a card is found among the played cards, Law 67 applies.
(b) If a card is found elsewhere, it is restored to the deficient hand, and penalties may apply (see 3., following).

2. Card Cannot Be Found

If a card cannot be found, the deal is reconstructed as nearly as can be determined in its original form by substituting another pack, and penalties may apply (see 3., following).

3. Possible Penalties

A card restored to a hand under the provisions of Section B of this Law is deemed to have belonged continuously to the deficient hand. It may become a penalty card (Law 50), and failure to have played it may constitute a revoke.


LAW 15 - PLAY OF A WRONG BOARD


A. Players Have Not Previously Played Board
If players play a board not designated for them to play in the current round:

1. Score Board as Played

The Director normally allows the score to stand if none of the four players have previously played the board.

2. Designate a Late Play

The Director may require both pairs to play the correct board against one another later.


B. One or More Players Have Previously Played Board
If any player playsparticipates in the play of a board he has previously played, with the correct opponents or otherwise, his second score on the board is cancelled both for his side and his opponents, and the Director shall award an artificial adjusted score to the contestants deprived of the opportunity to earn a valid score.played or spectated, the board must be skipped.


C. Discovered during Auction
If, during the auction period, the Director discovers that a contestant is playing a board not designated for him to play in the current round, he shall cancel the auction, ensure that the correct contestants are seated and that they are informed of their rights both now and at future rounds. A second auction begins. Players must repeat calls they made previously. If any call differs in any way from the corresponding call in the first auction, the Director shall cancel the board. Otherwise, play continues normally.


LAW 16 - UNAUTHORISED INFORMATION


Players are authorised to base their calls and plays on information from legal calls and or plays, and from mannerisms of opponents. To base a call or play on other extraneous information may be an infraction of law.

A. Extraneous Information from Partner
After a player makes available to his partner extraneous information that may suggest a call or play, as by means of a remark, a question, a reply to a question, or by unmistakable hesitation, unwonted speed, special emphasis, tone, gesture, movement, mannerism or the like, the partner may not choose from among logical alternative actions one that could demonstrably have been suggested over another by the extraneous information.

1. When Such Information Is Given

When a player considers that an opponent has made such information available and that damage could well result, he may, unless the regulations of the sponsoring organisation prohibit, immediately announce that he reserves the right to summon the Director later (the opponents should summon the Director immediatelymay immediately request that the board be skipped. The opponents should, if they dispute the fact that unauthorised information might have been conveyed).conveyed, so indicate and Law 16B.1 applies.

2. When Illegal Alternative Is Chosen

When a player has substantial reason to believe that an opponent who had a logical alternative has chosen an action that could have been suggested by such information, he should summon the Director forthwith. The Director shall require the auction and play to continue, standing ready to assign an adjusted may immediately request that the board be skipped. The opponents should, if they dispute that the action chosen could have been suggested by such information, or dispute the existence of a logical alternative, so indicate and Law16B.1 applies. score if he considers that an infraction of law has resulted in damage.


B. Extraneous Information from Other Sources
When a player accidentally receives unauthorised information about a board he is playing, or has yet to play, as by looking at the wrong hand; by overhearing calls, results or remarks; by seeing cards at another table; or by seeing a card belonging to another player at his own table before the auction begins, he should propose, and accept a proposal, that the board be skipped the Director should be notified forthwith, preferably by the recipient of the information. If the Director considers that the information could interfere with normal play, he may:

1. Adjust Positions

if the type of contest and scoring permit, adjust the players’ positions at the table, so that the player with information about one hand will hold that hand; or,

2. Appoint Substitute

with the concurrence of all four players, appoint a temporary substitute to replace the player who received the unauthorised information; or,

3. Award an Adjusted Score

forthwith award an artificial adjusted score.


B.1. Skip Procedure
When it may be necessary to skip a board and whenever a contestant requests or requires a skip, the players should attempt to reach a concensus. If no concensus is achieved, play of the board should continue, but the board subsequently may be skipped, by agreement of all of the players. If no agreement is reached, the matter may be referred for third-party adjudication if such is provided by the sponsoring organization.


C. Information from Withdrawn Calls and Plays
A call or play may be withdrawn, and another substituted, either by a non-offending side after an opponent’s infraction or by an offending side to rectify an infraction. Information arising from a withdrawn action is unauthorised.

1. Non-offending Side

For the non-offending side, all information Information arising from a withdrawn action is authorised, whether the action be its own or its opponents’.

2. Offending Side

For the offending side, information arising from its own withdrawn action and from withdrawn actions of the non-offending side is unauthorised. A player of the offending side may not choose from among logical alternative actions one that could demonstrably have been suggested over another by the unauthorised information.


CHAPTER V
The Auction

PART I
CORRECT PROCEDURE

SECTION ONE
AUCTION PERIOD

LAW 17 - DURATION OF THE AUCTION

A. Auction Period Starts


The auction period on a deal begins for a side when either partner looks at the face of his cards.the board is served by the OKb Server.

B. The First Call
The player designated by the board as dealer makes the first call.


C. Successive Calls
The player to dealer’s left makes the second call, and thereafter each player calls in turn in a clockwise rotation.

D. Cards from Wrong Board


If a player who has inadvertently picked up the cards from a wrong board makes a call, that call is cancelled. If offender’s LHO has called over the cancelled call, the Director shall assign artificial adjusted scores (see Law 90 for penalty) when offender’s substituted call differs in any significant way from his cancelled call. If offender subsequently repeats the cancelled call on the board from which he mistakenly drew his cards, the Director may allow that board to be played normally, but the Director shall assign artificial adjusted scores (see Law 90) when offender’s call differs in any way from his original cancelled call.

E. End of Auction Period


The auction period ends when all four players pass orwhen after three passes in rotation have followed any call. the opening lead is faced (when a pass out of rotation has been accepted, see Law 34).

LAW 18 - BIDS

A. Proper Form


A bid names a number of odd tricks, from one to seven, and a denomination. (Pass, double and redouble are calls but not bids.)

B. To Supersede a Bid


A bid supersedes a previous bid if it names either the same number of odd tricks in a higher-ranking denomination or a greater number of odd tricks in any denomination.

C. Sufficient Bid


A bid that supersedes the immediately previous bid is a sufficient bid.

D Insufficient Bid


A bid that fails to supersede the immediately previous bid is an insufficient bid.

E. Rank of the Denominations


The rank of the denominations in descending order is: no trump, spades, hearts, diamonds, clubs.

F. Different Methods


Zonal Organisations may authorise different methods of making calls.


LAW 19 - DOUBLES AND REDOUBLES


A. Doubles
1. Legal Double

A player may double only the last preceding bid. That bid must have been made by an opponent; calls other than pass must not have intervened.

2. Proper Form for Double

In doubling, a player should not state the number of odd tricks or the denomination. The only correct form is the single word "Double".

3. Double of Incorrectly Stated Bid

If a player, in doubling, incorrectly states the bid, or the number of odd tricks or the denomination, he is deemed to have doubled the bid as it was made. (Law 16 — Unauthorised Information — may apply.)

B. Redoubles


1. Legal Redouble

A player may redouble only the last preceding double. That double must have been made by an opponent; calls other than pass must not have intervened.

2. Proper Form for a Redouble

In redoubling, a player should not state the number of odd tricks or the denomination. The only correct form is the single word "Redouble".

3. Redouble of an Incorrectly Stated Bid

If a player, in redoubling, incorrectly states the doubled bid, or the number of odd tricks or the denomination, he is deemed to have redoubled the bid as it was made. (Law 16 — Unauthorised Information — may apply.)

C. Double or Redouble Superseded


Any double or redouble is superseded by a subsequent legal bid.

D. Scoring a Doubled or Redoubled Contract


If a doubled or redoubled bid is not followed by a subsequent legal bid, scoring values are increased as provided in Law 77.


LAW 20 - REVIEW AND EXPLANATION OF CALLS


A. Call Not Clearly Heard
A player who does not hear a call distinctly may forthwith require that it be repeated.

B. Review of Auction during Auction Period


During the auction period, aA player is entitled to have all previous calls restated when it is his turn to call, unless he is required by law to pass; Alerts should be included in the restatement.inspect the bidding record at any time.

C. Review after Final Pass


1. Opening Lead Inquiry

After the final pass either defender has the right to ask if it is his opening lead (see Laws 47E and 41).

2. Review of Auction

Declarer or either defender may, at his first turn to play, require all previous calls to be restated (see Law 41B and 41C).

D. Who May Review the Auction


A request to have calls restated shall be responded to only by an opponent.

E. Correction of Error in Review
All players, including dummy or a player required by law to pass, are responsible for prompt correction of errors in restatement (see Law 12C1 when an uncorrected review causes damage).

F. Explanation of Calls


1. During the Auction

During the auction and before the final pass, any player, at his own turn to call,

1. Any player may request a full explanation of the opponents’ auction (questions may be asked about calls actually made or about relevant calls available but not made); replies should normally be given by the partner of a player who made a enquiries and replies should be given privately and only to the player making the enquiry. call in question (see Law 75C).

2. During the Play Period

After the final pass and throughout the play period, either defender at his own turn to play may request an explanation of opposing auction. At his or dummy’s turn to play, the

2. The declarer may request an explanation of a defender’s call or card play conventions. Enquiries and replies should be given privately.

3. Players are encouraged to volunteer an explanation of their own calls, particularly when their methods are not in general use. Such explanations should be given privately, to both opponents.



LAW 21 - CALL BASED ON MISINFORMATION

A. Call Based on Caller’s Misunderstanding


A player has no recourse if he has made a call on the basis of his own misunderstanding. Any skip of the board is in the discretion of the opponents and there is no obligation to offer, nor accept a request, to skip the board.

B. Call Based on Misinformation from an Opponent


1. Change of Call

Until the end of the auction period (see Law 17E), a player may,without penalty, change a call when it is probable that he made thea call as a result of misinformation given to him by an opponent (failure to alert promptly to a conventional call or special understanding, where such alert is required by the sponsoring organisation, is deemed misinformation), provided that his partner has not subsequently called.require that the board be skipped.

2. Change of Call by Opponent Following Correction

When a player elects to change a call because of misinformation (as in 1., preceding), his LHO may then in turn change any subsequent call he may have made, without penalty (unless his withdrawn call conveyed such information as to damage the non-offending side, in which case the Director may assign an adjusted score). (For unauthorised information from withdrawn calls, see Law 16C.)

3. Too Late to Change Call

When it is too late to change a call, the Director may award an adjusted score (Law 40C may apply).

SECTION TWO
AUCTION HAS ENDED

LAW 22 - PROCEDURE AFTER THE AUCTION HAS ENDED

After the auction period has ended,

A. No Player Has Bid


if no player has bid, thehands are returned to the board is complete without play.There shall not be a redeal.

B. One or More Players Have Bid

if any player has bid, the final bid becomes the contract, and play begins.

PART II
IRREGULARITIES IN PROCEDURE

LAW 23 - DAMAGING ENFORCED PASS

Reference will be made to this Law from many other Laws that prescribe penalties for auction-period infractions.
When the penalty for an irregularity under any Law would compel the offender’s partner to pass at his next turn, if the Director deems that the offender, at the time of his irregularity, could have known that the enforced pass would be likely to damage the non-offending side, he shall require the auction and play to continue and consider awarding an adjusted score. (See Law 72B1.)

SECTION ONE
EXPOSED CARD, AUCTION PERIOD

LAW 24 - CARD EXPOSED OR LED DURING AUCTION

When the Director determines, during the auction, that because of a player’s action one or more cards of that player’s hand were in position for the face to be seen by his partner, the Director shall require that every such card be left face up on the table until the auction closes; and (penalty) if the offender subsequently becomes a defender, declarer may treat every such card as a penalty card (Law 50). In addition:

A. Low Card Not Prematurely Led


If it is a single card below the rank of an honour and not prematurely led, there is no further penalty.

B. Single Card of Honour Rank or Card Prematurely Led


If it is a single card of honour rank or is any card prematurely led, (penalty) offender’s partner must pass when next it is his turn to call (see Law 23 when a pass damages the non-offending side).


C. Two or More Cards Are Exposed
If two or more cards are so exposed, (penalty) offender’s partner must pass when next it is his turn to call (see Law 23 when a pass damages the non-offending side).

SECTION TWO
CHANGES OF CALLS

LAW 25 - LEGAL AND ILLEGAL CHANGES OF CALL

A. Immediate Correction of Inadvertency


Until his partner makes a call, aA player may substitute his intended call for an inadvertent call but only if he does so,requests, or attempts to do so,request, an undo without pause for thought. If legal, his last call stands without penalty; if illegal, it is subject to the applicable Law.an opponent has made a call before the request is communicated, the board should be skipped unless the players otherwise agree.

B. Delayed or Purposeful Correction


Until LHO calls, a call may be substituted when Section A does not apply:

1. Substitute Call Condoned

The substituted call may be accepted (treated as legal) at the option of offender’s LHO; then, the second call stands and the auction proceeds without penalty. If offender’s LHO has called before attention is drawn to the infraction and the Director determines that LHO intended his call to apply over the offender’s original call at that turn, offender’s substituted call stands without penalty, and LHO may withdraw his call without penalty (but see Law 16C2).

2. Not Condoned

If the substituted call is not accepted, it is cancelled, and

(a) First Call Illegal

if the first call was illegal, the offender is subject to the applicable law (and the lead penalties of Law 26 may apply to the second call).

(b) First Call Legal

if the first call was legal, the offender must either

(1) Let First Call Stand

allow his first call to stand, in which case (penalty) his partner must pass when next it is his turn to call (see Law 23 when the pass damages the non-offending side), or,

(2) Substitute Another Call

make any other legal call, in which case (penalty) the auction proceeds normally (but offender’s partner may not base calls on information from withdrawn calls); the offending side may receive no score greater than average minus (see Law 12C1).

(c) Lead Penalties

In either case (b) (1) or (b) (2) above, the offender’s partner will be subject to a lead penalty (see Law 26) if he becomes a defender.

LAW 26 - CALL WITHDRAWN, LEAD PENALTIES

When an offending player’s call is withdrawn, and he chooses a different final call for that turn, then if he becomes a defender:

A. Call Related to Specific Suit


if the withdrawn call related to a specified suit or suits and

1. Suit Specified

if that suit was specified by the same player, there is no lead penalty, but see Law 16C.

2. Suit Not Specified

if that suit was not specified in the legal auction by the same player, then declarer may (penalty) either require the offender’s partner to lead the specified suit (or one particular specified suit) at his first turn to lead, including the opening lead, or prohibit offender’s partner from leading the specified suit (or one particular specified suit) at his first turn to lead, including the opening lead, such prohibition to continue for as long as offender’s partner retains the lead.

B. Other Withdrawn Calls


For other withdrawn calls, (penalty) declarer may prohibit offender’s partner from leading any one suit at his first turn to lead, including the opening lead, such prohibition to continue for as long as offender’s partner retains the lead.

SECTION THREE
INSUFFICIENT BID

LAW 27 - INSUFFICIENT BID

A. Insufficient Bid Accepted


Any insufficient bid may be accepted (treated as legal) at the option of offender’s LHO. It is accepted if that player calls.

B. Insufficient Bid Not Accepted
If an insufficient bid made in rotation is not accepted, it must be corrected by the substitution of either a sufficient bid or a pass.

1. Not Conventional and Corrected by Lowest Sufficient Bid in Same Denomination

(a) No Penalty

If both the insufficient bid and the bid substituted are incontrovertibly not conventional and if the bid is corrected by the lowest sufficient bid in the same denomination, the auction proceeds as though the irregularity had not occurred (Law 16C2 does not apply to this situation, but see (b) following).

(b) Award of Adjusted Score

If the Director judges that the insufficient bid conveyed such information as to damage the non-offending side, he shall assign an adjusted score.

2. Conventional, or Corrected by Any Other Sufficient Bid or Pass

If either the insufficient bid or the lowest sufficient bid in the same denomination may have been conventional or if the bid is corrected by any other sufficient bid or by a pass, (penalty) the offender’s partner must pass whenever it is his turn to call (apply Law 10C1 and see Law 23 when the pass damages the non-offending side; and the lead penalties of Law 26 may apply).

3. Attempt to Correct by a Double or Redouble

If the offender attempts to substitute a double or redouble for his insufficient bid, the attempted call is cancelled, and (penalty) his partner must pass whenever it is his turn to call (see Law 23 when the pass damages the non-offending side, and the lead penalties of Law 26 may apply).


C. Insufficient Bid Out of Rotation

If a player makes an insufficient bid out of rotation, Law 31 applies.

SECTION FOUR
CALL OUT OF ROTATION

LAW 28 - CALLS CONSIDERED TO BE IN ROTATION

A. RHO Required to Pass


A call is considered to be in rotation when it is made by a player at his RHO’s turn to call if that opponent is required by law to pass.

B. Call by Correct Player Cancelling Call Out of Rotation


A call is considered to be in rotation when made by a player whose turn it was to call, before a penalty has been assessed for a call out of rotation by an opponent; making such a call forfeits the right to penalise the call out of rotation, and the auction proceeds as though the opponent had not called at that turn, but Law 16C2 applies.

LAW 29 - PROCEDURE AFTER A CALL OUT OF ROTATION

A. Forfeiture of Right to Penalise


Following a call out of rotation, offender’s LHO may elect to call, thereby forfeiting the right to penalise.


B. Out-of-Rotation Call Cancelled
Otherwise, a call out of rotation is cancelled (but see A preceding), and the auction reverts to the player whose turn it was to call. Offender may make any legal call in proper rotation, but his side may be subject to penalty under Laws 30, 31 or 32.

C. Call Out of Rotation Is Conventional


If a call out of rotation is conventional, the provisions of Laws 30, 31, and 32 shall apply to the denominations specified, rather than the denominations named.

LAW 30 - PASS OUT OF ROTATION

When a player has passed out of rotation (and the call is cancelled, as the option to accept the call has not been exercised — see Law 29):

A. Before Any Player Has Bid


When a player has passed out of rotation before any player has bid, (penalty) the offender must pass when next it is his turn to call and Law 72B1 may apply.

B. After Any Player Has Bid
1. At RHO’s Turn to Call

After any player has bid, when a pass out of rotation is made at offender’s RHO’s turn to call, (penalty) offender must pass when next it is his turn to call (if the pass out of rotation related by convention to a specific suit, or suits, thereby conveying information, the lead penalties of Law 26 may apply).

2. At Partner’s Turn to Call

(a) Action Required of Offender

After any player has bid, for a pass out of rotation made at the offender’s partner’s turn to call, (penalty) the offender must pass whenever it is his turn to call, and Law 72B1 may apply.

(b) Action Open to Offender’s Partner

Offender’s partner may make any sufficient bid, or may pass, but may not double or redouble at that turn, and Law 72B1 may apply.

3. At LHO’s Turn to Call

After any player has bid, a pass out of rotation at offender’s LHO’s turn to call is treated as a change of call and Law 25 applies.

C. When Pass Is a Convention
When the pass out of rotation is a convention, Law 31, not this Law, will apply. A pass is a convention if, by special agreement, it promises more than a specified amount of strength, or if it artificially promises or denies values other than in the last suit named.


LAW 31 - BID OUT OF ROTATION


When a player has bid out of rotation (and the bid is cancelled, as the option to accept the bid has not been exercised — see Law 29):

A. RHO’s Turn
When the offender has bid (or has passed partner’s call when it is a convention, in which case section A2(b) applies) at his RHO’s turn to call, then:

1. RHO Passes

If that opponent passes, offender must repeat the call out of rotation, and when that call is legal there is no penalty.

2. RHO Acts

If that opponent makes a legal bid, double or redouble, offender may make any legal call; when this call

(a) Repeats Denomination

repeats the denomination of his bid out of rotation, (penalty) offender’s partner must pass when next it is his turn to call (see Law 23).

(b) Does Not Repeat Denomination

does not repeat the denomination of his bid out of rotation, the lead penalties of Law 26 may apply, and (penalty) offender’s partner must pass whenever it is his turn to call (see Law 23).

B. Partner’s or LHO’s Turn


When the offender has bid at his partner’s turn to call, or at his LHO’s turn to call if the offender has not previously called, (penalty) offender’s partner must pass whenever it is his turn to call (see Law 23 when the pass damages the non-offending side), and the lead penalties of Law 26 may apply.


LAW 32 - DOUBLE OR REDOUBLE OUT OF ROTATION


A double or redouble out of rotation may be accepted at the option of the opponent next in rotation (see Law 29), except that an inadmissible double or redouble may never be accepted (see Law 35A if the opponent next in rotation nevertheless does call). If the illegal call is not accepted, it is cancelled, the lead penalties of Law 26B may apply, and:

A. Made at Offender’s Partner’s Turn to Call
If a double or redouble out of rotation has been made when it was the offender’s partner’s turn to call, (penalty) the offender’s partner must pass whenever it is his turn to call (see Law 23 when the pass damages the non-offending side).

B. Made at RHO’s Turn to Call


If a double or redouble out of rotation has been made at offender’s RHO’s turn to call, then:

1. RHO Passes

If offender’s RHO passes, offender must repeat his out- of-rotation double or redouble and there is no penalty unless the double or redouble is inadmissible, in which case Law 36 applies.

2. RHO Bids

If offender’s RHO bids, the offender may in turn make any legal call and (penalty) offender’s partner must pass whenever it is his turn to call (see Law 23 when the pass damages the non-offending side).


LAW 33 - SIMULTANEOUS CALLS

A call made simultaneously with one made by the player whose turn it was to call is deemed to be a subsequent call.

LAW 34 - RETENTION OF RIGHT TO CALL

When a call has been followed by three passes, the auction does not end when one of those passes was out of rotation, thereby depriving a player of his right to call at that turn. The auction reverts to the player who missed his turn. All subsequent passes are cancelled, and the auction proceeds as though there had been no irregularity.

LAW 35 - INADMISSIBLE CALL CONDONED

When, after any inadmissible call specified below, the offender’s LHO makes a call before a penalty has been assessed, there is no penalty for the inadmissible call (the lead penalties of Law 26 do not apply), and:

A. Double or Redouble


If the inadmissible call was a double or redouble not permitted by Law 19, that call and all subsequent calls are cancelled. The auction reverts to the player whose turn it is to call, and proceeds as though there had been no irregularity.

B. Action by Player Required to Pass


If the inadmissible call was a bid, double or redouble by a player required by law to pass, that call and all subsequent legal calls stand, but, if the offender was required to pass for the remainder of the auction, he must still pass at subsequent turns.


C. Bid of More than Seven
If the inadmissible call was a bid of more than seven, that call and all subsequent calls are cancelled; the offender must substitute a pass, and the auction proceeds as though there had been no irregularity.

D. Call after Final Pass


If the inadmissible call was a call after the final pass of the auction, that call and all subsequent calls are cancelled without penalty.

SECTION FIVE
INADMISSIBLE CALLS

LAW 36 - INADMISSIBLE DOUBLE OR REDOUBLE

Any double or redouble not permitted by Law 19 is cancelled. The offender must substitute a legal call, and (penalty) the offender’s partner must pass whenever it is his turn to call (see Law 23 when the pass damages the non-offending side); the lead penalties of Law 26 may apply. (If the call is out of turn, see Law 32; if offender’s LHO calls, see Law 35A.)

LAW 37 - ACTION VIOLATING OBLIGATION TO PASS

A bid, double or redouble by a player who is required by law to pass is cancelled, and (penalty) each member of the offending side must pass whenever it becomes his turn to call (see Law 23 when the pass damages the non-offending side). The lead penalties of Law 26 may apply. (If offender’s LHO calls, see Law 35B.)

LAW 38 - BID OF MORE THAN SEVEN

No play or score at a contract of more than seven is ever permissible. A bid of more than seven is cancelled, and (penalty) each member of the offending side must pass whenever it becomes his turn to call (see Law 23 when the pass damages the non-offending side). The lead penalties of Law 26 may apply. (If offender’s LHO calls, see Law 35C.)

LAW 39 - CALL AFTER FINAL PASS

A call made after the final pass of the auction is cancelled, and:
A. Pass or Call by Declaring Side


If it is a pass by a defender, or any call by the future declarer or dummy, there is no penalty.

B. Other Action by Defender


If it is a bid, double or redouble by a defender, the lead penalties of Law 26 may apply. (If offender’s LHO calls, see Law 35D.)

SECTION SIX
CONVENTIONS AND AGREEMENTS

LAW 40 - PARTNERSHIP UNDERSTANDINGS

A. Right to Choose Call or Play


A player may make any call or play (including an intentionally misleading call — such as a psychic bid — or a call or play that departs from commonly accepted, or previously announced, use of a convention), without prior announcement, provided that such call or play is not based on a partnership understanding.

B. Concealed Partnership Understandings Prohibited
A player may not make a call or play based on a special partnership understanding unless an opposing pair may reasonably be expected to understand its meaning, or unless his side discloses the use of such call or play in accordance with the regulations of the sponsoring organisation.

C. Director’sSkip Option


Ifthe Director decides that a side has been damaged through its opponents’ failure to explain ,when requested, the full meaning of a call or play, he may award an adjusted score.the side that has been damaged may, immediately upon becoming aware of the damage or potential for damage, require that the board be skipped.

D. Regulation of Conventions


The sponsoring organisation may regulate the use of bidding or play conventions. Zonal organisations may, in addition, regulate partnership understandings (even if not conventional) that permit the partnership’s initial actions at the one level to be made with a hand of a King or more below average strength. Zonal

organisations may delegate this responsibility.


E. Convention Card
1. Right to Prescribe

The sponsoring organisation may prescribe a convention card on which partners are to list their conventions and other agreements and may establish regulations for its use, including a requirement that both members of a partnership employ the same system (such a regulation must not restrict style and judgement, only method).

2. Referring to Opponents’ Convention Card

During the auction and play, any player except dummy may refer to his opponents’a convention card. at his own turn to call or play, but not to his own.


CHAPTER VI
The Play

PART I
PROCEDURE

SECTION ONE
CORRECT PROCEDURE

LAW 41 - COMMENCEMENT OF PLAY

A. Face-down Opening LeadOpening Lead


After a bid, double or redouble has been followed by three passes in rotation, the defender on presumed declarer’s left makes the opening lead. face down. The face-down lead may be withdrawn only upon instruction of the Director after an irregularity (see Law 47E2); the withdrawn card must be returned to thedefender’s hand.

B. Review of Auction and Questions


Before the opening lead is faced, the leader’s partner and the presumed declarer each may require a review of the auction, or request explanation of an opponent’s call (see Law 20). Declarer or either defender may, at his first turn to play a card, require a review of the auction; this right expires when he plays a card. The defenders (subject to Law 16) and the declarer retain the right to request explanations throughout the play period, each at his own turn to play.

C. Opening Lead Faced


Following this question period, the opening lead is faced, the play period begins, and dummy’s hand is spread. After it is too late to have previous calls restated (see B, above), declarer or either defender, at his own turn to play, is entitled to be informed as to what the contract is and whether, but not by whom, it was doubled or redoubled.

D. Dummy’s Hand


After the opening lead, is faced, dummy spreads his hand in front of him on the table, face up, sorted into suits, the cards in order of rank, in columns pointing lengthwise towards declarer, with trumps to dummy’s right. Declarer playsDeclarer plays both his hand and that of dummy.

LAW 42 - DUMMY’S RIGHTS

A. Absolute Rights


1. Give Information

Dummy is entitled to give information,in the Director’s presence, as to fact or law.

2. Keep Track of Tricks

He may keep count of tricks won and lost.

3. Play as Declarer’s Agent

He plays the cards of the dummy as declarer’s agent as directed (see Law 45F if dummy suggests a play).

B. Qualified Rights


Dummy may exercise other rights subject to the limitations provided in Law 43.

1. Revoke Inquiries

Dummy may ask declarer (but not a defender) when he has failed to follow suit to a trick whether he has a card of the suit led.

2. Attempt to Prevent Irregularity

He may try to prevent any irregularity by declarer.


3. Draw Attention to Irregularity

He may draw attention to any irregularity,but only after play of the hand is concluded.

LAW 43 - DUMMY’S LIMITATIONS

Except as specified in Law 42:

A. Limitations on Dummy


1. General Limitations
(a) Calling the Director
Unless attention has been drawn to an irregularity by another player, dummy should not initiate a call for the Director during play.
(b) Calling Attention to Irregularity
Dummy may not call attention to an irregularity during play.
(c) Participate in or Comment on Play

Dummy must not participate in the play, nor may he communicate anything about the play to declarer.

2. Limitations Carrying Specific Penalty

(a) Exchanging Hands

Dummy may not exchange hands with declarer.

(b) Leave Seat to Watch Declarer

Dummy may not leave his seat to watch declarer’s play of the hand.

(c) 2. Look at Defender’s Hand

Dummy may not, on his own initiative, look at the face of a card in either defender’s hand.may enter Spectator mode to watch the play of the hand, but having done so, must not leave and rejoin the table in non-Spectator mode prior to completion of the board unless requested to do so by an opponent or unless he has been disconnected, in which case he should re-enter Spectator mode without communicating about the board in play with any player.

B. Penalties for Violation


1. General Penalties

Dummy is liable to penalty under Law 90 for any violation of the limitations listed in A1 or A2 preceding.

2. Specific Penalties

If dummy, after violation of the limitations listed in A2 preceding:

(a) Warns Declarer on Lead

warns declarer not to lead from the wrong hand, (penalty) either defender may choose the hand from which declarer shall lead.

(b) Asks Declarer about Possible Irregularity

is the first to ask declarer if a play from declarer’s hand constitutes a revoke, declarer must substitute a correct card if his play was illegal, and the penalty provisions of Law 64 apply as if the revoke had been established.

3. If dummy after violation of the limitations listed in A2 preceding is the first to draw attention to a defender’s irregularity, no penalty shall be imposed. If the defenders benefit directly through their irregularity, the director shall award an adjusted score to both sides to restore equity.

LAW 44 - SEQUENCE AND PROCEDURE OF PLAY

A. Lead to a Trick


The player who leads to a trick may play any card in his hand. (unless he is subject to restriction after an irregularity committed by his side).

B. Subsequent Plays to a Trick


After the lead, each other player in turn plays a card, and the four cards so played constitute a trick. (For the method of playing cards and arranging tricks see Law 65.)

C. Requirement to Follow Suit


In playing to a trick, each player must follow suit if possible. This obligation takes precedence over all other requirements of these Laws.

D. Inability to Follow Suit


If unable to follow suit, a player may play any card. (unless he is subject to restriction after an irregularity committed by his side).

E. Tricks Containing Trumps


A trick containing a trump is won by the player who has contributed to it the highest trump.

F. Tricks Not Containing Trumps


A trick that does not contain a trump is won by the player who has contributed to it the highest card of the suit led.

G. Lead to Tricks Subsequent to First Trick


The player who has won the trick leads to the next trick.

LAW 45 - CARD PLAYED

A. Play of Card from a Hand


Each player except dummy plays a card by detaching it from his hand and facing it on the table immediately before him.any means permitted by the OKb Software.

B. Play of Card from Dummy


Declarer plays a card from dummy by naming the card, after which dummy picks up the card and faces it on the table. In playing from dummy’s hand declarer may, if necessary, pick up the desired card himself.

C. Compulsory Play of Card


1. Defender’s Card

A defender’s card held so that it is possible for his partner to see its face must be played to the current trick (if the defender has already made a legal play to the current trick, see Law 45E).

2. Declarer’s Card

Declarer must play a card from his hand held face up, touching or nearly touching the table, or maintained in such a position as to indicate that it has been played.

3. Dummy’s Card

A card in the dummy must be played if it has been deliberately touched by declarer except for the purpose of arranging dummy’s cards, or of reaching a card above or below the card or cards touched.

4. Named or Designated Card

(a) Play of Named Card

A card must be played if a player names or otherwise designates it as the card he proposes to play.

(b) Correction of Inadvertent Designation

A player may, without penalty, change an inadvertent designation if he does soplay of a card if he requests, or attempts to request, an undo without pause for thought; but if an opponent has, in turn, played a card that was legal before the change in designation, that opponent may withdraw without penalty the card so played and substitute another (see Law 47E). The server of a table may declare this Law inoperative during a round by posting in advance a table note to that effect, such as "no undo’s in card play". The players may, by agreement, at any time during a round suspend the operation of this Law.

5. Penalty Card

A penalty card, major or minor, may have to be played, subject to Law 50.

D. Card Misplayed by Dummy


If dummy places in the played position a card that declarer did not name, the card must be withdrawn if attention is drawn to it before each side has played to the next trick, and a defender may withdraw (without penalty) a card played after the error but before attention was drawn to it; if declarer’s RHO changes his play, declarer may withdraw a card he had subsequently played to that trick (see Law 16C2).

E. Fifth Card Played to Trick


1. By a Defender

A fifth card contributed to a trick by a defender becomes a penalty card, subject to Law 50, unless the Director deems that it was led, in which case Law 53 or 56 applies.

2. By Declarer

When declarer contributes a fifth card to a trick from his own hand or dummy, there is no penalty unless the Director deems that it was led, in which case Law 55 applies.

F. Dummy Indicates Card


After dummy’s hand is faced, dummy may not touch or indicate any card (except for purpose of arrangement) without instruction from declarer. If he does so, the Director should be summoned forthwith. The Director shall rule whether dummy’s act did in fact constitute a suggestion to declarer. When the Director judges that it did, he allows play to continue, reserving his right to assign an adjusted score if the defenders were damaged by the play so suggested.

G. Turning the Trick


No player should turn his card face down until all four players have played to the trick.

SECTION TWO
IRREGULARITIES IN PROCEDURE

LAW 46 - INCOMPLETE OR ERRONEOUS CALL OF CARD FROM DUMMY

A. Proper Form for Designating Dummy’s Card


When calling a card to be played from dummy, declarer should clearly state both the suit and the rank of the desired card.

B. Incomplete or Erroneous Call


In case of an incomplete or erroneous call by declarer of the card to be played from dummy, the following restrictions apply (except when declarer’s different intention is incontrovertible):

1. Incomplete Designation of Rank

If declarer, in playing from dummy, calls "high", or words of like import, he is deemed to have called the highest card: in fourth seat he may be deemed to have called for the lowest winning card of the suit indicated; if he directs dummy to win the trick, he is deemed to have called the lowest winning card; if he calls "low", or words of like import, he is deemed to have called the lowest.

2. Designates Suit but Not Rank

If declarer designates a suit but not a rank, he is deemed to have called the lowest card of the suit indicated.

3. Designates Rank but Not Suit

If declarer designates a rank but not a suit:

(a) In Leading

Declarer is deemed to have continued the suit in which dummy won the preceding trick, provided there is a card of the designated rank in that suit.

(b) All Other Cases

In all other cases, declarer must play a card from dummy of the designated rank if he can legally do so; but if there are two or more such cards that can be legally played, declarer must designate which is intended.

4. Designates Card Not in Dummy

If declarer calls a card that is not in dummy, the call is void and declarer may designate any legal card.

5. No Suit or Rank Designated

If declarer indicates a play without designating either a suit or rank (as by saying, "play anything’’, or words of like import), either defender may designate the play from dummy.

LAW 47 - RETRACTION OF CARD PLAYED

A. To Comply with Penalty


A card once played may be withdrawn to comply with a penalty (but a defender’s withdrawn card may become a penalty card, see Law 49).

B. To Correct an Illegal Play


A played card may be withdrawn to correct an illegal or simultaneous play (see Law 58 for simultaneous play; and, for defenders, see Law 49, penalty card).

C. To Change an Inadvertent Designation


A played card may be withdrawn without penalty after a change of designation asif permitted by Law 45C4(b).

D. Following Opponent’s Change of Play


After an opponent’s change of play, a played card may be withdrawn without penalty (but see Law 62C2) to substitute another card for the one played.

E. Change of Play Based on Misinformation


1. Lead Out of Turn

A lead out of turn may be retracted without penalty if the leader was mistakenly informed by an opponent that it was his turn to lead (LHO should not accept the lead).

2. Retraction of Play

(a) No One Has Subsequently Played

A player may retract the card he has played because of a mistaken explanation of an opponent’s call or play and before a corrected explanation and before a corrected explanation, but only if no card was subsequently played to that trick. An opening lead may not be retracted after dummy has faced any card.

(b) One or More Subsequent Plays Made

When it is too late to correct a play, under (a) preceding, Law 40C applies.

F. Illegal Retraction


Except as provided in A through E precedingthese Laws, a card once played may not be withdrawn.

PART II
PENALTY CARD

LAW 48 - EXPOSURE OF DECLARER’S CARDS

A. Declarer Exposes a Card


Declarer is not subject to penalty for exposing a card, and no card of declarer’s or dummy’s hand ever becomes a penalty card. Declarer is not required to play any card dropped accidentally.

B. Declarer Faces Cards


1. After Opening Lead Out of Turn
When declarer faces his cards after an opening lead out of turn, Law 54 applies.

2. At Any Other Time
When declarer faces his cards at any time other than immediately after an opening lead out of turn, he may be deemed to have made a claim or concession of tricks, and Law 68 then applies.

LAW 49 - EXPOSURE OF A DEFENDER’S CARDS

Except in the normal course of play or application of law, when a defender’s card is in a position in which his partner could possibly see its face, or when a defender names a card as being in his hand, (penalty) each such card becomes a penalty card (Law 50); but see the footnote to Law 68 when a defender has made a statement concerning an uncompleted trick currently in progress.

LAW 50 - DISPOSITION OF PENALTY CARD


A card prematurely exposed (but not led, see Law 57) by a defender is a penalty card unless the Director designates otherwise. The Director shall award an adjusted score, in lieu of the rectifications below, when he deems that Law 72B1 applies.

A. Penalty Card Remains Exposed
A penalty card must be left face up on the table immediately before the player to whom it belongs, until an alternate penalty has been selected.

B. Major or Minor Penalty Card?


A single card below the rank of an honour and exposed inadvertently (as in playing two cards to a trick, or in dropping a card accidentally) becomes a minor penalty card. Any card of honour rank, or any card exposed through deliberate play (as in leading out of turn, or in revoking and then correcting), becomes a major penalty card; when one defender has two or more penalty cards, all such cards become major penalty cards.

C. Disposition of Minor Penalty Card


When a defender has a minor penalty card, he may not play any other card of the same suit below the rank of an honour until he has first played the penalty card (however, he is entitled to play an honour card instead). Offender’s partner is not subject to lead penalty, but information gained through seeing the penalty card is extraneous, unauthorised (see Law 16A).


D. Disposition of Major Penalty Card
When a defender has a major penalty card, both the offender and his partner may be subject to restriction, the offender whenever he is to play, the partner when he is to lead.

1. Offender to Play

A major penalty card must be played at the first legal opportunity, whether in leading, following suit, discarding or trumping (the requirement that offender must play the card is authorised information for his partner; however, other information arising from facing of the penalty card is unauthorised for partner). If a defender has two or more penalty cards that can legally be played, declarer designates which is to be played. The obligation to follow suit, or to comply with a lead or play penalty, takes precedence over the obligation to play a major penalty card, but the penalty card must still be left face up on the table and played at the next legal opportunity.

2. Offender’s Partner to Lead

When a defender has the lead while his partner has a major penalty card, he may not lead until declarer has stated which of the options below is selected (if the defender leads prematurely, he is subject to penalty under Law 49). Declarer may choose:

(a) Require or Forbid Lead of Suit

to require the defender to lead the suit of the penalty card, or to prohibit him from leading that suit for as long as he retains the lead (for two or more penalty cards, see Law 51); if declarer exercises this option, the card is no longer a penalty card and is picked up.

(b) No Lead Restriction

not to require or prohibit a lead, in which case the defender may lead any card; the penalty card remains a penalty card.

LAW 51 - TWO OR MORE PENALTY CARDS

A. Offender to Play


If a defender has two or more penalty cards that can legally be played, declarer designates which is to be played at that turn.

B. Offender’s Partner to Lead


1. Penalty Cards in Same Suit

(a) Declarer Requires Lead of That Suit

When a defender has two or more penalty cards in one suit, and declarer requires the defender’s partner to lead that suit, the cards of that suit are no longer penalty cards and are picked up; the defender may make any legal play to the trick.

(b) Declarer Prohibits Lead of That Suit

If the declarer prohibits the lead of that suit, the defender picks up every penalty card in that suit and may make any legal play to the trick.

2. Penalty Cards in More Than One Suit

(a) Declarer Requires Lead of a Specified Suit

When a defender has penalty cards in more than one suit, declarer may require the defender’s partner to lead any suit in which the defender has a penalty card (but B1(a) preceding then applies).

(b) Declarer Prohibits Lead of Specified Suits

When a defender has penalty cards in more than one suit, declarer may prohibit the defender’s partner from leading one or more of such suits; but the defender then picks up every penalty card in every suit prohibited by declarer and makes any legal play to the trick.

LAW 52 - FAILURE TO LEAD OR PLAY A PENALTY CARD

A. Defender Fails to Play Penalty Card


When a defender fails to lead or play a penalty card as required by Law 50, he may not, on his own initiative, withdraw any other card he has played.

B. Defender Plays Another Card


1. Play of Card Accepted

(a) Declarer May Accept Play

If a defender has led or played another card when required by law to play a penalty card, declarer may accept such lead or play.

(b) Declarer Must Accept Play

Declarer must accept such lead or play if he has thereafter played from his own hand or dummy.

(c) Penalty Card Remains Penalty Card

If the played card is accepted under either (a) or (b) preceding, the unplayed penalty card remains a penalty card.

2. Play of Card Rejected


Declarer may require the defender to substitute the penalty card for the card illegally played or led. Every card illegally led or played by the defender in the course of committing the irregularity becomes a major penalty card.

PART III
IRREGULAR LEADS AND PLAYS

SECTION ONE
LEAD OUT OF TURN

LAW 53 - LEAD OUT OF TURN ACCEPTED

A. Lead Out of Turn Treated as Correct Lead


Any lead faced out of turn may be treated as a correct lead. It becomes a correct lead if declarer or either defender, as the case may be, accepts it (by making a statement to that effect), or if the player next in rotation plays to the irregular lead, but see Law 47E1. (If no acceptance statement or play is made, the Director will require that the lead be made from the correct hand.)

B. Wrong Defender Plays Card to Declarer’s Irregular Lead


If the defender at the right of the hand from which the lead out of turn was made plays to the irregular lead, the lead stands and Law 57 applies.

C. Proper Lead Made Subsequent to Irregular Lead


If it was properly the turn to lead of an opponent of the player who led out of turn, that opponent may make his proper lead to the trick of the infraction without his card being deemed played to the irregular lead. When this occurs, the proper lead stands, and all cards played in error to this trick may be withdrawn without penalty. (Law 16C2 applies to a defender.)

LAW 54 - FACED OPENING LEAD OUT OF TURN

When an opening lead is faced out of turn, and offender’s partner leads face down, the director requires the face down lead to be retracted, and the following sections apply.

A. Declarer Spreads His Hand


After a faced opening lead out of turn, declarer may spread his hand; he becomes dummy, and dummy becomes declarer. If declarer begins to spread his hand, and in doing so exposes one or more cards, he must spread his entire hand.

B. Declarer Accepts Lead


When a defender faces the opening lead out of turn declarer may accept the irregular lead as provided in Law 53, and dummy is spread in accordance with Law 41.

1. Declarer Plays Second Card

The second card to the trick is played from declarer’s hand.

2. Dummy Has Played Second Card

If declarer plays the second card to the trick from dummy, dummy’s card may not be withdrawn except to correct a revoke.

C. Declarer Must Accept Lead


If declarer could have seen any of dummy’s cards (except cards that dummy may have exposed during the auction and that were subject to Law 24), he must accept the lead.

D. Declarer Refuses Opening Lead


When declarer requires the defender to retract his faced opening lead out of turn, Law 56 applies.

LAW 55 - DECLARER’S LEAD OUT OF TURN

A. Declarer’s Lead Accepted


If declarer has led out of turn from his or dummy’s hand, either defender may accept the lead as provided in Law 53, or require its retraction (after misinformation, see Law 47E1).

B. Declarer Required to Retract Lead


1. Defender’s Turn to Lead

If declarer has led from his or dummy’s hand when it was a defender’s turn to lead, and if either defender requires him to retract such lead, declarer restores the card led in error to the proper hand without penalty.

2. Lead in Declarer’s Hand or Dummy’s

If declarer has led from the wrong hand when it was his turn to lead from his hand or dummy’s, and if either defender requires him to retract the lead, he withdraws the card led in error. He must lead from the correct hand.


C. Declarer Might Obtain Information
When declarer adopts a line of play that could have been based on information obtained through the infraction, the Director may award an adjusted score.

LAW 56 - DEFENDER’S LEAD OUT OF TURN

When declarer requires a defender to retract his faced lead out of turn, the card illegally led becomes a major penalty card, and Law 50D applies.

SECTION TWO
OTHER IRREGULAR LEADS AND PLAYS

LAW 57 - PREMATURE LEAD OR PLAY BY DEFENDER

A. Premature Play or Lead to Next Trick


When a defender leads to the next trick before his partner has played to the current trick, or plays out of turn before his partner has played, (penalty) the card so led or played becomes a penalty card, and declarer selects one of the following options. He may:

1. Highest Card

require offender’s partner to play the highest card he holds of the suit led, or

2. Lowest Card
require offender’s partner to play the lowest card he holds of the suit led, or

3. Card of Another Suit
forbid offender’s partner to play a card of another suit specified by declarer.

B. Offender’s Partner Cannot Comply with Penalty


When offender’s partner is unable to comply with the penalty selected by declarer, he may play any card, as provided in Law 59.

C. Declarer Has Played from Both Hands before Irregularity


A defender is not subject to penalty for playing before his partner if declarer has played from both hands, or if dummy has played a card or has illegally suggested that it be played. A singleton in dummy, or one of cards adjacent in rank of the same suit, is not considered to be automatically played.

LAW 58 - SIMULTANEOUS LEADS OR PLAYS

A. Simultaneous Plays by Two Players


A lead or play made simultaneously with another player’s legal lead or play is deemed to be subsequent to it.

B. Simultaneous Cards from One Hand


If a player leads or plays two or more cards simultaneously:

1. One Card Visible

If only one card is visible, that card is played; all other cards are picked up without penalty.

2. More Cards Visible

If more than one card is visible, the player designates the card he proposes to play; when he is a defender, each other card exposed becomes a penalty card (see Law 50).

3. After Visible Card Withdrawn

After a player withdraws a visible card, an opponent who subsequently played to that card may withdraw his play and substitute another without penalty (see Law 16C).

4. Error Not Discovered

If the simultaneous play remains undiscovered until both sides have played to the next trick, Law 67 applies.

LAW 59 - INABILITY TO LEAD OR PLAY AS REQUIRED

A player may play any otherwise legal card if he is unable to lead or play as required to comply with a penalty, whether because he holds no card of the required suit, or because he has only cards of a suit he is prohibited from leading, or because he is obliged to follow suit.

LAW 60 - PLAY AFTER AN ILLEGAL PLAY

A. Play of Card after Irregularity


1. Forfeiture of Right to Penalise

A play by a member of the non-offending side after his RHO has led or played out of turn or prematurely, and before a penalty has been assessed, forfeits the right to penalise that offence.

2. Irregularity Legalised

Once the right to penalise has been forfeited, the illegal play is treated as though it were in turn (but Law 53C applies to the player whose turn it was).

3. Other Penalty Obligations Remain

If the offending side has a previous obligation to play a penalty card, or to comply with a lead or play penalty, the obligation remains at future turns.

B. Defender Plays before Required Lead by Declarer


When a defender plays a card after declarer has been required to retract his lead out of turn from either hand, but before declarer has led from the correct hand, the defender’s card becomes a penalty card (Law 50).

C. Play by Offending Side before Assessment of Penalty


A play by a member of the offending side before a penalty has been assessed does not affect the rights of the opponents, and may itself be subject to penalty.

SECTION THREE
THE REVOKE

LAW 61 - FAILURE TO FOLLOW SUIT - INQUIRIES CONCERNING A REVOKE

A. Definition of Revoke


Failure to follow suit in accordance with Law 44 or failure to lead or play, when able, a card or suit required by law or specified by an opponent in accordance with an agreed penalty, constitutes a revoke (but see Law 59 when unable to comply).

B. Right to Inquire about a Possible Revoke


Declarer may ask a defender who has failed to follow suit whether he has a card of the suit led (but a claim of revoke does not automatically warrant inspection of quitted tricks — see Law 66C). Dummy may ask declarer (but see Law 43B2(b)). Defenders may ask declarer but, unless the Zonal organisation so authorises, not one another.

LAW 62 - CORRECTION OF A REVOKE

A. Revoke Must Be Corrected


A player must correct his revoke if he becomes aware of the irregularity before it becomes established.

B. Correcting a Revoke


To correct a revoke, the offender withdraws the card he played in revoking and follows suit with any card.

1. Defender’s Card

A card so withdrawn becomes a penalty card (Law 50) if it was played from a defender’s unfaced hand.

2. Declarer’s or Dummy’s Card, Defender’s Faced Card

The card may be replaced without penalty if it was played from declarer’s or dummy’s hand, or if it was a defender’s faced card.

C. Subsequent Cards Played to Trick


1. By Non-offending Side

Each member of the non-offending side may, without penalty, withdraw any card he may have played after the revoke but before attention was drawn to it (see Law 16C).

2. By Partner of Offender

After a non-offender so withdraws a card, the hand of the offending side next in rotation may withdraw its played card, which becomes a penalty card if the player is a defender (see Law 16C).

D. Revoke on Trick Twelve


1. Must Be Corrected

On the twelfth trick, a revoke, even if established, must be corrected if discovered before all four hands have been returned to the board.

2. Offender’s Partner Had Not Played to Trick Twelve

If a revoke by a defender occurred before it was the turn of his partner to play to the twelfth trick, and if offender’s partner has cards of two suits, (penalty) offender’s partner may not choose the play that could possibly have been suggested by seeing the revoke card.

LAW 63 - ESTABLISHMENT OF A REVOKE

A. Revoke Becomes Established


A revoke becomes established:

1. Offending Side Leads or Plays to Next Trick

when the offender or his partner leads or plays to the following trick (any such play, legal or illegal, establishes the revoke).

2. A Member of Offending Side Indicates a Lead or Play

when the offender or his partner names or otherwise designates a card to be played to the following trick.

3. Member of Offending Side Makes a Claim or Concession

when a member of the offending side makes or acquiesces in a claim or concession of tricks orally or by facing his hand (or in any other fashion).

B. Attention Is Illegally Drawn


When there has been a violation of Law 61B, the revoker must substitute a legal card and the penalty provisions of Law 64 apply as if the revoke had been established.

C. Revoke May Not Be Corrected


Once a revoke is established, it may no longer be corrected (except as provided in Law 62D for a revoke on the twelfth trick), and the trick on which the revoke occurred stands as played (but see Law 43B2(b)).

LAW 64 - PROCEDURE AFTER ESTABLISHMENT OF A REVOKE

A. Penalty Assessed


When a revoke is established: 1. Offending Player Won Revoke Trick

and the trick on which the revoke occurred was won by the offending player, (penalty) after play ceases, the trick on which the revoke occurred plus one of any subsequent tricks won by the offending side are transferred to the non-offending side.

2. Offending Player Did Not Win Revoke Trick

and the trick on which the revoke occurred was not won by the offending player, then, if the offending side won that or any subsequent trick, (penalty) after play ceases, one trick is transferred to the non-offending side; also, if an additional trick was subsequently won by the offending player with a card that he could legally have played to the revoke trick, one such trick is transferred to the non-offending side.

B. No Penalty Assessed


The penalty for an established revoke does not apply:

1. Offending Side Fails to Win Revoke Trick or Subsequent Trick

if the offending side did not win either the revoke trick or any subsequent trick.

2. Second Revoke in Same Suit by Offender

to a subsequent revoke in the same suit by the same player.

3. Revoke by Failure to Play a Faced Card

if the revoke was made in failing to play any card faced on the table or belonging to a hand faced on the table, including a card from dummy’s hand.

4. After Non-offending Side Calls to Next Deal

if attention was first drawn to the revoke after a member of the non-offending side has made a call on the subsequent deal.

5. After Round Has Ended

if attention was first drawn to the revoke after the round has ended.

6. Revoke on Twelfth Trick

to a revoke on the twelfth trick.

C. Director Responsible for Equity


When, after any established revoke, including those not subject to penalty, the Director deems that the non-offending side is insufficiently compensated by this Law for the damage caused, he shall assign an adjusted score.


PART IV
TRICKS

LAW 65 - ARRANGEMENT OF TRICKS

A. Completed Trick


When four cards have been played to a trick, each player turns his own card face down near him on the table.

B. Keeping Track of the Ownership of Tricks


1. Tricks Won

If the player’s side has won the trick, the card is pointed lengthwise toward his partner.

2. Tricks Lost


If the opponents have won the trick, the card is pointed lengthwise toward the opponents.


C. Orderliness
Each player arranges his own cards in an orderly overlapping row in the sequence played, so as to permit review of the play after its completion, if necessary to determine the number of tricks won by each side or the order in which the cards were played.

D. Agreement on Results of Play


A player should not disturb the order of his played cards until agreement has been reached on the number of tricks won. A player who fails to comply with the provisions of this Law jeopardises his right to claim ownership of doubtful tricks or to claim a revoke.

LAW 66 - INSPECTION OF TRICKS

A. Current Trick


So long as his side has not led or played to the next trick, declarer or either defender may, until he has turned his own card face down on the table, require that all cards just played to the trick be faced.

B. Own Last Card


Until a card is led to the next trick, declarer or either defender may inspect, but not expose, his own last card played.

C. Quitted Tricks


Thereafter, until play ceases, quitted tricks may not
The immediately preceding quitted trick may be inspected (except at the Director’s specific instruction; for example, to verify a claim of a revoke).by any player.

D. After the Conclusion of Play


After play ceases, the played and unplayed cards may be inspected to settle a claim of a revoke, or of the number of tricks won or lost; but no player should handle cards other than his own. If, after such a claim has been made, a player mixes his cards in such a manner that thewith the Results Browser. Director can no longer ascertain the facts, the Director shall rule in favour of the other side.

LAW 67 - DEFECTIVE TRICK

A. Before Both Sides Play to Next Trick


When a player has omitted to play to a trick, or has played too many cards to a trick, the error must be rectified if attention is drawn to the irregularity before a player on each side has played to the following trick.

1. Player Failed to Play Card

To rectify omission to play to a trick, the offender supplies a card he can legally play.

2. Player Contributed Too Many Cards

To rectify the play of too many cards to a trick, Law 45E (Fifth Card Played to a Trick) or Law 58B (Simultaneous Cards from One Hand) shall be applied.

B. After Both Sides Play to Next Trick


After both sides have played to the following trick, when attention is drawn to a defective trick or when the Director determines that there had been a defective trick (from the fact that one player has too few or too many cards in his hand, and a correspondingly incorrect number of played cards), the Director establishes which trick was defective. To rectify the number of cards, the Director should proceed as follows.

1. Offender Has Too Many Cards

When the offender has failed to play a card to the defective trick, the Director shall require him forthwith to face a card and to place it appropriately among his played cards (this card does not affect ownership of the trick); if

(a) Offender Has Card of Suit Led

the offender has a card of the suit led to the defective trick, he must choose such a card to place among his played cards, and there is no penalty.

(b) Offender Has No Card of Suit Led

the offender has no card of the suit led to the defective trick, he chooses any card to place among his played cards, and (penalty) he is deemed to have revoked on the defective trick -— he may be subject to the one-trick penalty of Law 64.

2. Offender Has Too Few Cards

When the offender has played more than one card to the defective trick, the Director inspects the played cards and requires the offender to restore to his hand all extra cards, leaving among the played cards the one faced in playing to the defective trick (if the Director is unable to determine which card was faced, the offender leaves the highest of the cards that he could legally have played to the trick). A restored card is deemed to have belonged continuously to the offender’s hand, and a failure to have played it to an earlier trick may constitute a revoke.

PART V
CLAIMS AND CONCESSIONS

LAW 68 - CLAIM OR CONCESSION OF TRICKS

For a statement or action to constitute a claim or concession of tricks under these Laws, it must refer to tricks other than one currently in progress. If it does refer to subsequent tricks:

A. Claim Defined


Any statement to the effect that a contestant will win a specific number of tricks is a claim of those tricks. A contestant also claims when he suggests that play be curtailed, or when he shows his cards (unless he demonstrably did not intend to claim).

B. Concession Defined


Any statement to the effect that a contestant will lose a specific number of tricks is a concession of those tricks; a claim of some number of tricks is a concession of the remainder, if any. A player concedes all the remaining tricks when he abandons his hand. Regardless of the foregoing, if a defender attempts to concede one or more tricks and his partner immediately objects, no concession has occurred; Law 16, Unauthorised Information, may apply, so the Director should be summoned forthwith.


A. Claims
Declarer claims when he invokes the claim function of the OKb Software.

B. Cancellation of Claim


Provided there has not been any communication by the defenders, declarer may cancel a claim that has not been accepted or rejected.

C. Clarification Required for Claim


A claim should be accompanied at once byIf requested by the defenders, declarer should provide a statement of clarification as to the order in which cards will be played, or the line of play or defence through which the claimerhe proposes to win the tricks claimed. Unless a defender objects, that statement may be made by continuing play.

D. Play Ceases May Resume


After any claim or concession, play ceases. All play subsequent to a claim or concession shall be voided by the Director. If the claim or concession is acquiesced in, Law 69 applies; if it is disputed by any player (dummy included), the Director must be summoned immediately to apply Law 70 or Law 71, and no action may be taken pending the Director’s arrival. If either opponent rejects a claim, or if declarer cancels his claim before there has been any communication by the defenders respecting the claim, play resumes.

LAW 69 - ACQUIESCENCE IN CLAIM OR CONCESSION

A. When Acquiescence Occurs


Acquiescence occurs when a contestant assents to an opponent’s claim or concession, and raises no objection to it before his side makes a call on a subsequent board, or before the round ends. The board is scored as though the tricks claimed or conceded had been won or lost in play.

B. Acquiescence in Claim Withdrawn


Within the correction period established in accordance with Law 79C, a contestant may withdraw acquiescence in an opponent’s claim, but only if he has acquiesced in the loss of a trick his side has actually won, or in the loss of trick that could not, in the Director’s judgement, be lost by any normal play of the remaining cards. The board is rescored with such trick awarded to the acquiescing side.

LAW 70 - CONTESTED CLAIMS

A. General Objective


In ruling onAfter a contested claim, the Director adjudicates the resultplay of the board should be completed as equitably as possible to both sides.but any doubtful points shall be resolved against the claimer. The Director proceeds as follows. If the claim is a premature claim and the rejection of the claim or a request of declarer to provide a statement of clarification conveys information to declarer about the distribution or placement of the defenders’ remaining cards, and that information may reasonably be regarded as influencing declarer’s subsequent play or statement, the defenders may require that the board be skipped.

B. Clarification Statement Repeated


1. Require Claimer to Repeat Statement

The Director requires claimer to repeat the clarification statement he made at the time of his claim.

2. Require All Hands to Be Faced

Next, the Director requires all players to put their remaining cards face up on the table.

3. Hear Objections

The Director then hears the opponents’ objections to the claim.

C. There Is an Outstanding Trump


When a trump remains in one of the opponents’ hands, the Director shall award a trick or tricks to the opponents if:

1. Failed to Mention Trump

claimer made no statement about that trump, and

2. Was Probably Unaware of Trump

it is at all likely that claimer at the time of his claim was unaware that a trump remained in an opponent’s hand, and

3. Could Lose a Trick to the Trump

a trick could be lost to that trump by any normal play.



D. Claimer Proposes New Line of Play

The Director shall not accept from claimer any successful line of play not embraced in the original clarification statement if there is an alternative normal line of play that would be less successful.

E. Unstated Line of Play (Finesse or Drop)


The Director shall not accept from claimer anyAfter a rejected claim, no unstated line of play should be taken, the success of which depends upon finding one opponent rather than the other with a particular card, unless an opponent failed to follow to the suit of that card before the claim was made, or would subsequently fail to follow to that suit on any normal line of play; or unless failure to adopt this line of play would be irrational.

LAW 71 - CONCESSION CANCELLED


A concession must stand, once made, except that within the correction period established in accordance with Law 79C, the Director shall cancel a concession:

A. Trick Cannot Be Lost
if a player has conceded a trick his side had, in fact, won, or a trick his side could not have lost by any legal play of the remaining cards.

B. Contract Already Fulfilled or Defeated


if declarer has conceded defeat of a contract he had already fulfilled, or a defender has conceded fulfilment of a contract his side had already defeated.

C. Implausible Concession


if a player has conceded a trick that cannot be lost by any normal play of the remaining cards. Until the conceding side makes a call on a subsequent board, or until the round ends, the Director shall cancel the concession of a trick that could not have been lost by any normal play of the remaining cards.

CHAPTER VII
Proprieties

LAW 72 - GENERAL PRINCIPLES

A. Observance of Laws


1. General Obligation on Contestants

Duplicate bridge tournamentsOKb at competitive non-tourney tables should be played in strict accordance with the Laws.OKb Laws, unless all contestants agree otherwise.

2. Scoring of Tricks Won

A player must not knowingly accept either the score for a trick that his side did not win or the concession of a trick that his opponents could not lose.

3. Waiving of Penalties

In duplicate tournaments a player may not, on his own initiative, waive a penalty for an opponent’s infraction, even if he feels that he has not been damaged (but he may ask the Director to do so — see Law 81C8).

4. Non-offenders’ Exercise of Legal Options

When these Laws provide the innocent side with an option after an irregularity committed by an opponent, it is appropriate to select that action most advantageous.

5. Offenders’ Options

Subject to Law 16C2, after the offending side has paid the prescribed penalty for an inadvertent infraction, it is appropriate for the offenders to make any call or play advantageous to their side, even though they thereby appear to profit through their own infraction.

6. Responsibility for Enforcement of Laws

The responsibility for penalising irregularities and redressing damage rests solely upon the Director and these Laws, not upon the players themselves.

B. Infraction of Law
1. Adjusted ScoreIrregularity Likely to Damage

Whenever the Director deemsplayers determine that an offender could have known at the time of his irregularity that the irregularity would be likely to damage the non-offending side, he shall require the auction and play to continue, afterwards awarding an adjusted score if hethe non-offending side may require that the board be skipped. considers that the offending side gained an advantage through the irregularity.

2. Intentional

A player must not infringe a law intentionally, even if there is a prescribed penalty he is willing to pay.

3. Inadvertent Infraction

There is no obligation to draw attention to an inadvertent infraction of law committed by one’s own side (but see footnote to Law 75 for a mistaken explanation).

4. Concealing an Infraction

A player may not attempt to conceal an inadvertent infraction, as by committing a second revoke, concealing a card involved in a revoke or mixing the cards prematurely.

LAW 73 - COMMUNICATION

A. Proper Communication between Partners


1. How Effected

Communication between partners during the auction and play shall be effected only by means of the calls and plays themselves.

2. Correct Manner for Calls and Plays

Calls and plays should be made without special emphasis, mannerism or inflection, and without undue hesitation or haste (however, sponsoring organisations may require mandatory pauses, as on the first round of auction, or after a skip-bid warning, or on the first trick).


B. Inappropriate Communication Between Partners
1. Gratuitous Information

Partners shall not communicate through the manner in which calls or plays are made, through extraneous remarks or gestures, through public questions asked or not asked of the opponents or through alerts andpublic explanations given or not given toby them.

2. Prearranged Communication

The gravest possible offence is for a partnership to exchange information through prearranged methods of communication other than those sanctioned by these Laws. A guilty partnership risks expulsion.

C. Player Receives Unauthorised Information from Partner


When a player has available to him unauthorised information from his partner, as from a remark, question, explanation, gesture, mannerism, special emphasis, inflection, haste or hesitation, he must carefully avoid taking any advantage that might accrue to his side.side and if the information is or may be material, he should propose, or accept a proposal, that the board be skipped.

D. Variations in Tempo or Manner


1. Inadvertent Variations

It is desirable, though not always required, for players to maintain steady tempo and unvarying manner. However, players should be particularly careful in positions in which variations may work to the benefit of their side. Otherwise, inadvertently to vary the tempo or manner in which a call or play is made does not in itself constitute a violation of propriety, but inferences from such variation may appropriately be drawn only by an opponent, and at his own risk.

2. Intentional Variations

A player may not attempt to mislead an opponent by means of remark or gesture, through the haste or hesitancy of a call or play (as in hesitating before playing a singleton), or by the manner in which the call or play is made.

E. Deception


A player may appropriately attempt to deceive an opponent through a call or play (so long as the deception is not protected by concealed partnership understanding or experience). It is entirely appropriate to avoid giving information to the opponents by making all calls and plays in unvarying tempo and manner.

F. Violation of Proprieties


When a violation of the Proprieties described in this law results in damage to an innocent opponent,

1. Player Acts on Unauthorised Information

ifthe Director determines that a player chose from among logical alternative actions one that could demonstrably have been suggested over another by his partner’s remark, manner, tempo, or the like, he shall award an adjusted score (see Law 16).extraneous or unauthorized information, he should propose, or accept a proposal, that the board be skipped.

2. Player Injured by Illegal Deception

ifthe Director determines that an innocent player has drawn a false inference from a remark, manner, tempo, or the like, of an opponent who has no demonstrable bridge reason for the action or which could not have resulted from network traffic congestion or temporary absence from the table, and who could have known, at the time of the action, that the action could work to his benefit, the Director shall award opponents should propose, or accept a proposal, that the board be skipped. an adjusted score (see Law 12C),

G. Deliberate Premature Claims


A player may not attempt to obtain information about the distribution or placement of the defenders’ cards by making a premature claim.

LAW 74 - CONDUCT AND ETIQUETTE

A. Proper Attitude


1. Courtesy

A player should maintain a courteous attitude at all times.

2. Etiquette of Word and Action

A player should carefully avoid any remark or action that might cause annoyance or embarrassment to another player or might interfere with the enjoyment of the game.

3. Conformity to Correct Procedure

Every player should follow uniform and correct procedure in calling and playing.

B. Etiquette


As a matter of courtesy a player should refrain from:

1. paying insufficient attention to the game.

2. making gratuitous comments during the auction and play.

3. detaching a card before it is his turn to play.

4. prolonging play unnecessarily (as in playing on although he knows that all the tricks are surely his) for the purpose of disconcerting an opponent.

5. summoning and addressing the Director in a manner discourteous to him or to other contestants.deliberately leaving a table during the play of a board when not the dummy, unless necessitated by circumstances unrelated to OKbridge play.

6. absenting himself from the computer with which he is playing OKbridge, unless necessitated by circumstances unrelated to OKbridge play or unless the player is the dummy, in which cases the player should communicate his temporary absence.

7. closing the table, as server, during the play of a board, unless necessitated by circumstances unrelated to OKbridge play.



C. Violations of Procedure
The following are considered violations of procedure:

1. using different designations for the same call.

2. indicating approval or disapproval of a call or play.

3. indicating the expectation or intention of winning or losing a trick that has not been completed.

4. commenting or acting during the auction or play so as to call attention to a significant occurrence, or to the number of tricks still required for success.

5. looking intently at any other player during the auction and play, or at another player’s hand as for the purpose of seeing his cards or of observing the place from which he draws a card (but it is appropriate to act on information acquired by inadvertently seeing an opponent’s card).

6. showing an obvious lack of further interest in a deal.(as by folding one’s cards).

7. varying the normal tempo of bidding or play for the purpose of disconcerting an opponent.

8. leaving the table needlessly before the round is called.



LAW 75 - PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS


A. Special Partnership Agreements
Special partnership agreements, whether explicit or implicit, must be fully and freely available to the opponents (see Law 40). Information conveyed to partner through such agreements must arise from the calls, plays and conditions of the current deal.

B. Violations of Partnership Agreements


A player may violate an announced partnership agreement, so long as his partner is unaware of the violation (but habitual violations within a partnership may create implicit agreements, which must be disclosed). No player has the obligation to disclose to the opponents that he has violated an announced agreement and if the opponents are subsequently damaged, as through drawing a false inference from such violation, they are not entitled to redress.

C. Answering Questions on Partnership Agreements
When explaining the significance of partner’s call or play in reply to an opponent’s inquiry (see Law 20), a player shall disclose all special information conveyed to him through partnership agreement or partnership experience, but he need not disclose inferences drawn from his general knowledge and experience.

D. Correcting Errors in Explanation


1. Explainer Notices Own Error

If a player subsequently realises that his own private explanation was erroneous or incomplete, he must immediately call the Director (who will apply Law 21 or Law 40C).inform the opponents and the player and his partner must acquiesce in an immediate request by the opponents to skip the board

2. Error Noticed by Explainer’s Partner

A player whose partner has given a public mistaken explanation may not correct the error before the final pass, nor may he indicate in any manner that a mistake has been made; a defender may not correct the error until play ends. After calling the Director at the earliest legal opportunity (after the final pass, if he is to be declarer or dummy, after play ends, if he is to be a defender), the playermust privately inform the opponents that, in his opinion, his partner’s explanation was erroneous.


 Two examples may clarify responsibilities of the players (and the Director) after a misleading explanation has been given to the opponents. In both examples following, North has opened 1NT and South, who holds a weak hand with long diamonds, has bid 2, intending to sign off; North explains, however, in answer to West's inquiry, that South's bid is strong and artificial, asking for major suits.

Example 1 - Mistaken Explanation
The actual partnership agreement is that 2 is a natural sign-off; the mistake was in North's explanation. This explanation is an infraction of law, since East-West are entitled to an accurate description of the North-South agreement (when this infraction results in damage to East-West, the Director shall award an adjusted score). If North subsequently becomes aware of his mistake, he must immediately notify the Director. South must do nothing to correct the mistaken explanation while the auction continues; after the final pass, South, if he is to be declarer or dummy, should call the Director and must volunteer a correction of the explanation. If South becomes a defender, he calls the Director and corrects the explanation when play ends.

Example 2 - Mistaken Bid
The partnership agreement is as explained - 2 is strong and artificial; the mistake was in South's bid. Here there is no infraction of law, since East-West did receive an accurate description of the North-South agreement; they have no claim to an accurate description of the North-South hands. (Regardless of damage, the Director shall allow the result to stand; but the Director is to presume Mistaken Explanation, rather than Mistaken Bid, in the absence of evidence to the contrary.) South must not correct North's explanation (or notify the Director) immediately, and he has no responsibility to do so subsequently.

In both examples, South, having heard North's explanation, knows that his own 2 bid has been misinterpreted. This knowledge is ``unauthorised information'' (see Law 16A), so South must be careful not to base subsequent actions on this information (if he does, the Director shall award an adjusted score). For instance, if North rebids 2NT, South has the unauthorised information that this bid merely denies a four-card holding in either major suit; but South's responsibility is to act as though North had made a strong game try opposite a weak response, showing maximum values.


LAW 76 - SPECTATORS

A. Conduct During Bidding or Play


1. One Hand Only

A spectator should not look at the hand of more than one player, except by permission.

2. Personal Reaction

A spectator must not display any reaction to the bidding or play while a deal is in progress.

3. Mannerisms or Remarks

During the round, a spectator must refrain from mannerisms or remarks of any kind (including conversation with a player).

4. Consideration for Players
A spectator must not in any way disturb a player.

B. Spectator Participation

A spectator may not call attention to any irregularity or mistake, nor speak on any question of fact or law except by request of the Director.


CHAPTER VIII
The Score

LAW 77 - DUPLICATE BRIDGE SCORING TABLE

TRICK SCORE

Scored by declarer's side if the contract is fulfilled.
IF TRUMPS ARE:
For each odd trick bid and made
Undoubled
Doubled
Redoubled
20203030
40406060
8080120120
AT A NO TRUMP CONTRACT
UNDOUBLEDDOUBLEDREDOUBLED
For first odd trick bid and made 4080160
For each additional odd trick 3060120
A trick score of 100 points or more, made on one board, is GAME.
A trick score of less than 100 points is a PART SCORE.

PREMIUM SCORE
Scored by declarer’s side

SLAMS
For making a slamNot VulnerableVulnerable
Small Slam (12 tricks) bid and made500750
Grand Slam (all 13 tricks) bid and made10001500

OVERTRICKS
For each OVERTRICK
(tricks made in excess of contract)
Not VulnerableVulnerable
UndoubledTrick ValueTrick Value
Doubled100200
Redoubled200400

PREMIUMS FOR GAME, PARTSCORE, FULFILLING CONTRACT
For making GAME, not vulnerable300
For making any PARTSCORE50
For making any doubled, but not redoubled contract50
For making any redoubled contract100

UNDERTRICK PENALTIES
Scored by declarer’s opponents if the contract is not fulfilled

UNDERTRICKS
Tricks by which declarer falls short of the contract
Not VulnerableVulnerable
UndbldDbldRdbldUndbldDbldRdbld
For first undertrick50100200100200400
For each additional undertrick50200400100300600
Bonus for the fourth
and each subsequent undertrick
0100200000

LAW 78 - METHODS OF SCORING
A. Matchpoint Scoring
In matchpoint scoring each contestant is awarded, for scores made by different contestants who have played the same board and whose scores are compared with his, two scoring units (matchpoints or half matchpoints) for each score inferior to his, one scoring unit for each score equal to his, and zero scoring units for each score superior to his.

B. International Matchpoint Scoring
In international matchpoint scoring, on each board the total point difference between the two scores compared is converted into IMPs according to the following scale.

Difference
in points
IMPsDifference
in points
IMPsDifference
in points
IMPs
20–401370–42091500–174017
50–802430–490101750–199018
90–1203500–590112000–224019
130–1604600–740122250–249020
170–210&5750–890132500–299021
220–2606900–1090143000–349022
270–31071100–1290153500–399023
320–36081300–1490164000 & upward24
C. Total Point Scoring
In total point scoring, the net total point score of all boards played is the score for each contestant.

D. Special Scoring Methods


Special scoring methods are permissible, if approved by the sponsoring organisation. In advance of any contest the sponsoring organisation should publish conditions of contest detailing conditions of entry, methods of scoring, determination of winners, breaking of ties, and the like.

LAW 79 - TRICKS WON

A. Agreement on Tricks Won


The number of tricks won shall be agreed upon before all four hands have been returned to the board.determined by the OKb Server.


B. Disagreement on Tricks Won
If a subsequent disagreement arises, the Director must be called. No increase in score need be granted unless the Director is called before the round ends as specified in Law 8 (but Law 69 or Law 71 may supersede this provision when there has been an acquiescence or a concession).

C. Error in Score

An error in computing or tabulating the agreed-upon score, whether made by a player or scorer, may be corrected until the expiration of the period specified by the sponsoring organisation. Unless the sponsoring organisation specifies a later time, this correction period expires 30 minutes after the official score has been made available for inspection.

CHAPTER IX
Tournament Sponsorship

LAW 80 - SPONSORING ORGANISATION

A sponsoring organisation conducting an event under these Laws has the following duties and powers:

A. Tournament Director


to appoint the tournament Director. If there is no tournament Director, the players should designate one of their own number to perform his functions.

B. Advance Arrangements


to make advance arrangements for the tournament, including playing quarters, accommodations and equipment.

C. Session Times


to establish the date and time of each session.

D. Conditions of Entry


to establish the conditions of entry.

E. Special Conditions


to establish special conditions for bidding and play (such as written bidding, bidding boxes, screens — penalty provisions for actions not transmitted across a screen may be suspended).

F. Supplementary Regulations


to publish or announce regulations supplementary to, but not in conflict with, these Laws.

G. Appeals


To make suitable arrangements for appeals of contested skip requests to be heard.

H. Conduct and Ethics Referrals


To make suitable arrangements for referrals of conduct and ethics violations to be heard.

CHAPTER X
Tournament Director

SECTION ONE
RESPONSIBILITIES

LAW 81 - DUTIES AND POWERS

A. Official Status


The Director is the official representative of the sponsoring organisation.

B. Restrictions and Responsibilities


1. Technical Management

The Director is responsible for the technical management of the tournament.

2. Observance of Laws and Regulations

The Director is bound by these Laws and by supplementary regulations announced by the sponsoring organisation.

C. Director’s Duties and Powers


The Director’s duties and powers normally include the following:

1. Assistants

to appoint assistants, as required, to perform his duties.

2. Entries

to accept and list entries.

3. Conditions of Play

to establish suitable conditions of play and to announce them to the contestants.

4. Discipline

to maintain discipline and to insure the orderly progress of the game.

5. Law

to administer and interpret these Laws and to advise the players of their rights and responsibilities thereunder.

6. Errors

to rectify an error or irregularity of which he becomes aware in any manner, within the correction period established in accordance with Law 79C.

7. Penalties

to assess penalties when applicable.

8. Waiver of Penalties

to waive penalties for cause, at his discretion, upon the request of the non-offending side.

9. Disputes

to adjust disputes; to refer a matter to the appropriate committee.

10. Scores

to collect scores and tabulate results.

11. Reports

to report results to the sponsoring organisation for official record.

D. Delegation of Duties


The Director may delegate any of the duties listed in "C’ to assistants, but he is not thereby relieved of responsibility for their correct performance.

LAW 82 - RECTIFICATION OF ERRORS OF PROCEDURE

A. Director’s Duty


It is the duty of the Director to rectify errors of procedure and to maintain the progress of the game in a manner that is not contrary to these Laws.

B. Rectification of Error


To rectify an error in procedure the Director may:

1. Award of Adjusted Score

award an adjusted score as permitted by these Laws.

2. Specify Time of Play

require or postpone the play of a board.

C. Director’s Error


If the Director has given a ruling that he or the Chief Director subsequently determines to be incorrect, and if no rectification will allow the board to be scored normally, he shall award an adjusted score, considering both sides as non-offending for that purpose

LAW 83 - NOTIFICATION OF THE RIGHT TO APPEAL

If the Director believes that a review of his decision on a point of fact or exercise of his discretionary power might be in order (as when he awards an adjusted score under Law 12), he shall advise a contestant of his right to appeal or may refer the matter to an appropriate committee.

SECTION TWO
RULINGS

LAW 84 - RULINGS ON AGREED FACTS

When the Director is called to rule on a point of law or regulation in which the facts are agreed upon, he shall rule as follows:

A. No Penalty


If no penalty is prescribed by law, and there is no occasion for him to exercise his discretionary powers, he directs the players to proceed with the auction or play.

B. Penalty under Law


If a case is clearly covered by a Law that specifies a penalty for the irregularity, he assesses that penalty and sees that it is paid.

C. Player’s Option


If a Law gives a player a choice among penalties, the Director explains the options and sees that a penalty is selected and paid.

D. Director’s Option


If the Law gives the Director a choice between a specified penalty and the award of an adjusted score, he attempts to restore equity, resolving any doubtful point in favour of the non-offending side.

E. Discretionary Penalty


If an irregularity has occurred for which no penalty is provided by law, the Director awards an adjusted score if there is even a reasonable possibility that the non-offending side was damaged, notifying the offending side of its right to appeal (see Law 81C9).

LAW 85 - RULINGS ON DISPUTED FACTS

When the Director is called upon to rule on a point of law or regulation in which the facts are not agreed upon, he shall proceed as follows:

A. Director’s Assessment


If the Director is satisfied that he has ascertained the facts, he rules as in Law 84.

B. Facts Not Determined


If the Director is unable to determine the facts to his satisfaction, he shall make a ruling that will permit play to continue, and notify the players of their right to appeal.

SECTION THREE
CORRECTION OF IRREGULARITIES

LAW 86 - IN TEAM PLAY

A. Average Score at IMP Play
When the Director chooses to award an artificial adjusted score of average plus or average minus in IMP play, that score is plus 3 IMPs or minus 3 IMPs respectively.

B. Non-balancing Adjustments, Knockout Play


When the Director assigns non-balancing adjusted scores (see Law 12C) in knockout play, each contestant’s score on the board is calculated separately. The average of the two scores is then assigned to both contestants.

C. Substitute Board


The Director shall not exercise his Law 6 authority to order one board redealt when the final result of a match without that board could be known to a contestant. Instead, he awards an adjusted score.

LAW 87 - FOULED BOARD

A. Definition


A board is considered to be "fouled" if the Director determines that one or more cards were misplaced in the board, in such manner that contestants who should have had a direct score comparison did not play the board in identical form.

B. Scoring the Fouled Board


In scoring a fouled board the Director determines as closely as possible which scores were made on the board in its correct form, and which in the changed form. He divides the score on that basis into two groups, and rates each group separately as provided in the regulations of the sponsoring organisation.

In some forms of team contests, the sponsoring organisation may prescribe a redeal (see Law 6.

SECTION FOUR
PENALTIES

LAW 88 - AWARD OF INDEMNITY POINTS

In a pair or individual event, when a non-offending contestant is required to take an artificial adjusted score through no fault or choice of his own, such contestant shall be awarded a minimum of 60% of the matchpoints available to him on that board, or the percentage of matchpoints he earned on boards actually played during the session if that percentage was greater than 60%.

LAW 89 - PENALTIES IN INDIVIDUAL EVENTS

In individual events, the Director shall enforce the penalty provisions of these Laws, and the provisions requiring the award of adjusted scores, equally against both members of the offending side, even though only one of them may be responsible for the irregularity. But the Director, in awarding adjusted scores, shall not assess procedural penalty points against the offender’s partner, if, in the Director’s opinion, he is in no way responsible for the violation.

LAW 90 - PROCEDURAL PENALTIES

A. Director’s Authority


The Director, in addition to enforcing the penalty provisions of these Laws, may also assess penalties for any offence that unduly delays or obstructs the game, inconveniences other contestants, violates correct procedure, or requires the award of an adjusted score at another table.

B. Offences Subject to Penalty


Offences subject to penalty include but are not limited to:

1. Tardiness

arrival of a contestant after the specified starting time.

2. Slow Play

unduly slow play by a contestant.

3. Loud Discussion

discussion of the bidding, play or result of a board, which may be overheard at another table.

4. Comparing Scores

unauthorised comparison of scores with another contestant.

5. Touching Another’s Cards

touching or handling of cards belonging to another player (Law 7).

6. Misplacing Cards in Board

placing one or more cards in an incorrect pocket of the board.

7. Errors in Procedure

errors in procedure (such as failure to count cards in one’s hand, playing the wrong board, etc.) that require an adjusted score for any contestant.

8. Failure to Comply

failure to comply promptly with tournament regulations or with any instruction of the Director.

LAW 91 - PENALISE OR SUSPEND

A. Director’s Power


In performing his duty to maintain order and discipline, the Director is specifically empowered to assess disciplinary penalties in points or to suspend a contestant for the current session or any part thereof (the Director’s decision under this clause is final).

B. Right to Disqualify


The Director is specifically empowered to disqualify a contestant for cause, subject to approval by the Tournament Committee or sponsoring organisation.

CHAPTER XI
APPEALS

LAW 92 - RIGHT TO APPEAL

A. Contestant’s Right


A contestant or his Captain may appeal for a review of any ruling made at his table by the Director.contested decision not to skip a board and may refer any complaint of a conduct and ethics violation, in each case in accordance with procedures established by the sponsoring organization.

B. Time of Appeal


The right to request or appeal a Director’s ruling expires 30 minutes after the official score has been made available for inspection, unless the sponsoring organisation has specified a different time period.

C. How to Appeal


All appeals shall be made through the Director.

D. Concurrence of Appellants


An appeal shall not be heard unless both members of a pair (except in an individual contest) or the captain of a team, concur in appealing. An absent member shall be deemed to concur.

LAW 93 - PROCEDURES OF APPEAL

A. No Appeals Committee


The Chief Director shall hear and rule upon all appeals if there is no Tournament or Appeals Committee, or when a committee cannot meet without disturbing the orderly progress of the tournament.

B. Appeals Committee Available


If a committee is available,

1. Appeal Concerns Law

The Chief Director shall hear and rule upon such part of the appeal as deals solely with the Law or regulations. His ruling may be appealed to the committee.

2. All Other Appeals

The Chief Director shall refer all other appeals to the committee for adjudication.

3. Adjudication of Appeals

In adjudicating appeals the committee may exercise all powers assigned by these Laws to the Director, except that the committee may not overrule the Director on a point of law or regulations, or on exercise of his disciplinary powers. The committee may recommend to the Director that he change his ruling.

C. Appeal to National Authority


After the preceding remedies have been exhausted, further appeal may be taken to the national authority.